On 17 May 2010, at 11:38, David Chelimsky wrote:
On May 16, 2010, at 11:10 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
On May 16, 2010, at 8:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On May 16, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-
case gene
On 16 May 2010, at 18:54, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
> generation tool like Quickcheck (for erlang/haskell). I'd be interested in
> hearing any impressions, war stories, or dev workflows regarding a tool like
>
On May 16, 2010, at 11:10 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On May 16, 2010, at 8:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On May 16, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
>>> generation tool like Quickcheck (
On May 16, 2010, at 8:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On May 16, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
>> generation tool like Quickcheck (for erlang/haskell). I'd be interested in
>> hearing any impre
On May 16, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
> generation tool like Quickcheck (for erlang/haskell). I'd be interested in
> hearing any impressions, war stories, or dev workflows regarding a tool like
>
Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with an automated test-case
generation tool like Quickcheck (for erlang/haskell). I'd be interested in
hearing any impressions, war stories, or dev workflows regarding a tool like
this. Talking off list to David C, he suggested that it might
