On Mar 21, 2008, at 3:18 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> Rather than anything that does not start with
>> Scenario|Given|When|Then|And being treated as a comment it seems more
>> future-proof if we just say that any line whose first non-whitespace
>> character is a # ... is a comment.
>
> Great ide
All,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps now is the time to devise a formal "comment indicator." I
> > think the obvious choice would be the same one we use in Ruby: #
> >
> > Given this step
> > # this is a comment
> > When this other step
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/21/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Doesn't it already work this way?
>
> If I "comment out" lines this way in a plain text story, they seem to
> be totally ignored.
>
I believe that is because the current behavior is that anything that doesn't
start wit
On 3/21/08, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps now is the time to devise a formal "comment indicator." I
> > >
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps now is the time to devise a formal "comment indicator." I
> > think the obvious choice would be the same one we use in Ruby: #
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:38 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > newb q: The "pending" support for spec's and steps is nice. I'm just
> > wondering why a scenario itself can't be pending?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Tim Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> newb q: The "pending" support for spec's and steps is nice. I'm just
> wondering why a scenario itself can't be pending?
Because nobody asked for it :)
Wanna file a feature request at lighthouse? http://rspec.
Hi there,
newb q: The "pending" support for spec's and steps is nice. I'm just
wondering why a scenario itself can't be pending? I.e. it seems to me like
it would be nice to write up scenario titles for scenarios as you think of
them, and for low-priority fringe scenarios leave the steps unwritt
