Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:16 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:28 AM, aslak hellesoy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:20 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphun

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Andreas Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:28 PM, aslak hellesoy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> How will people know that a method is part of an API? Can we simply say that >> if it has RDoc it's part of the API and stable, and if it doe

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:28 AM, aslak hellesoy > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:20 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphunk <[EMA

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread Peter Jaros
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How will people know that a method is part of an API? Can we simply say that > if it has RDoc it's part of the API and stable, and if it doesn't it's not? > (We can still RDoc non-API code, just put :nodoc: on it so it d

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread Andreas Wolff
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:28 PM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How will people know that a method is part of an API? Can we simply say that > if it has RDoc it's part of the API and stable, and if it doesn't it's not? > (We can still RDoc non-API code, just put :nodoc: on it so it do

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread Andreas Wolff
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:28 PM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How will people know that a method is part of an API? Can we simply say that > if it has RDoc it's part of the API and stable, and if it doesn't it's not? > (We can still RDoc non-API code, just put :nodoc: on it so it do

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-24 Thread David Chelimsky
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:28 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:20 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > same problem here. I always used "example.

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-23 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:20 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in > > a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passin

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-21 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:20 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in >> a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passing exam

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-21 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, rubyphunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in > a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passing example > belongs to. > Is there another way to get the file path? Looking through th

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-20 Thread rubyphunk
Hi, same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passing example belongs to. Is there another way to get the file path? lg // andreas On 20 Nov., 20:37, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2008, at 2

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-20 Thread Scott Taylor
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ben Fyvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11 and found that this no longer exists: # File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84 def

Re: [rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-20 Thread David Chelimsky
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ben Fyvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11 and found > that this no longer exists: > > > > # File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84 > > def implementation_backtrace > > eval("cal

[rspec-users] Missing method implementation_backtrace

2008-11-20 Thread Ben Fyvie
We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11 and found that this no longer exists: # File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84 def implementation_backtrace eval("caller", @_implementation) end I don't really know what this method is for and