On 8/24/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
> > On 8/23/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of
> >>> splitting
> >>> up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the
On 8/24/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
>
> > On 8/23/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of
> >>> splitting
> >>> up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the
On Aug 23, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of
>>> splitting
>>> up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the specs that do require the
>>> database. When you want to speci
On 8/23/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of splitting
> > up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the specs that do require the
> > database. When you want to specify behavior you can just stub out the
> > columns (becaus
> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of splitting
> up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the specs that do require the
> database. When you want to specify behavior you can just stub out the
> columns (because AR does try to hit the db to find the column info).
> Obvio
On 8/23/07, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
> > On 8/23/07, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >> I think I saw a thread about this earlier (maybe it was on the devlopers
> >> list) but I am wondering if anyone has stubbed out AR so that the unit
David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>> I think I saw a thread about this earlier (maybe it was on the devlopers
>> list) but I am wondering if anyone has stubbed out AR so that the unit
>> test do not hit the database. The reason I am curious
On 8/23/07, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
> I think I saw a thread about this earlier (maybe it was on the devlopers
> list) but I am wondering if anyone has stubbed out AR so that the unit
> test do not hit the database. The reason I am curious is because there
> was a lightning
Hey all,
I think I saw a thread about this earlier (maybe it was on the devlopers
list) but I am wondering if anyone has stubbed out AR so that the unit
test do not hit the database. The reason I am curious is because there
was a lightning talk given at the Ruby Hoedown (watch it here:
http://
