Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-24 Thread Wilker
Hi Guys, I added a significant release of Aidmock today. Now it supports an Automatic Interfacing feature. With this feature you can use Aidmock without defining any interface at all, when Aidmock try to check an interface, and it doesn't exists, Aidmock will automatic generate the interface (of

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread Wilker
Thanks guys, When I said I'm not getting so much feedback, I was referring because more time ago I talked about it in a lot of other lists too, but I know it still a lot young, and need a lot of improvement too :) But you know, when we launch a new project we get a lot excited with it and expects

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread Pat Maddox
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Wilker wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately I'm not receiving too much feedback about it for now, so, > I'm just using for myself and trying to make it better. I will try to spread > more and more the idea, so make more people wanna try it, its a different > concept and I m

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 18, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Wilker wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately I'm not receiving too much feedback about it for now, so, > I'm just using for myself and trying to make it better. I will try to spread > more and more the idea, so make more people wanna try it, its a different > concept and I m

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread Wilker
Yeah, unfortunately I'm not receiving too much feedback about it for now, so, I'm just using for myself and trying to make it better. I will try to spread more and more the idea, so make more people wanna try it, its a different concept and I mean people still a little afraid to try it. But I will

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Wilker wrote: > David > > Also, will be nice if in the future you and other mock frameworks authors > support some kind of reflection on defined doubles (or even better, I can > define an "Aidmock support guideline" to you implement support by > yourselves). If you

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-18 Thread Wilker
David Also, will be nice if in the future you and other mock frameworks authors support some kind of reflection on defined doubles (or even better, I can define an "Aidmock support guideline" to you implement support by yourselves). If you take a look at current RSpec Mocks driver on Aidmock[1] yo

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-17 Thread Wilker
Dave, I just updated the gem and documentation, now supporting constrained_to on mocks :) You have any other suggestions for now? --- Wilker LĂșcio http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio Kajabi Consultant +55 81 82556600 On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Wilker wrote: > You are right Dave, > > I was t

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-17 Thread Wilker
You are right Dave, I was thinking about it, but with a different interface, like: Aidmock.double(Interface) but I mean your is cooler, and user will be able to apply mocks/stubs directly I will work on it today :) Thanks --- Wilker LĂșcio http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio Kajabi Consultant +55 8

Re: [rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-16 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 16, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wilker wrote: > Hi guys, > > I launched some days ago a new project that aims to make the use of mocks > safer. > This is the URL of project: https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock > > The basic idea is to make user define interfaces of classes, when user > defines t

[rspec-users] Aidmock - safe mocking

2011-01-16 Thread Wilker
Hi guys, I launched some days ago a new project that aims to make the use of mocks safer. This is the URL of project: https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock The basic idea is to make user define interfaces of classes, when user defines the class interface (which is something like defining method