On 30/04/2009, at 7:59 AM, Kero van Gelder wrote:
So basically, I want to do something like this:
examples = load_examples_without_running
examples.each {|example| puts example.description}
[snip]
I'm working into a big corporate in Australia, and they are demanding
traceability of tests b
>>> So basically, I want to do something like this:
>>>
>>> examples = load_examples_without_running
>>> examples.each {|example| puts example.description}
[snip]
> I'm working into a big corporate in Australia, and they are demanding
> traceability of tests back to requirements. I'm already u
[snip]
I'm really sorry about this, but I just couldn't wait for tonight to
add this:
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/commit/a4b3aac62e940c50077bdeb7d9ad5ee11e02116d
The release *will* have to wait for tonight, but you can easily build
the gem locally: http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2009, at 9:41 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
On 29/04/2009, at 9:41 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews >
wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
>>> running them, so I can traverse the object tree an
On 29/04/2009, at 8:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews
wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do th
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Marty Andrews wrote:
> I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
> running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
> etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do that though.
> There seems to be an inherent assumpt
On 29 Apr 2009, at 07:23, Marty Andrews wrote:
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do that though.
There seems to be an inherent assumption in the f
I'd like to load all of my examples into memory without actually
running them, so I can traverse the object tree and get descriptions
etc. I'm finding it tricky to figure out how to do that though.
There seems to be an inherent assumption in the framework that that
examples will actually run.
So
10 matches
Mail list logo
