On Nov 21, 2007 5:05 PM, Patrick Aljord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is a msys branch of git that is extremely easy to install in
> > windows from this url: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ I tried it
> > and it seems to work pretty well
> >
>
> +1
>
> With this, Git is perfectly usable o
> There is a msys branch of git that is extremely easy to install in
> windows from this url: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ I tried it
> and it seems to work pretty well
>
+1
With this, Git is perfectly usable on Windows now, there is no reason
for not using it on this platform.
There is a msys branch of git that is extremely easy to install in
windows from this url: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ I tried it
and it seems to work pretty well
On Nov 19, 2007 2:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 8:55 AM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Nov 19, 2007 8:55 AM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 1:21 AM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/18/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I don't intend to use RSpec s
Luis Lavena wrote:
> the use of cygwin git is a bit problematic, and sometimes eol styles
> mixes don't like the different interpreters (unix eol against windows
> eol) with ruby-mswin32 and ruby cygwin.
Yeah, I'll echo this. I do a lot of work with Perl, and it's a real bear
to port Cygwin Perl
On Nov 19, 2007 1:21 AM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/18/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
> > > people would be satisfied wit
On 11/18/07, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
> > people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
> > can check out from / in to a
On Nov 18, 2007 9:57 PM, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
> people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
> can check out from / in to a Subversion repository just fine.
>
That poses a problem for
I don't intend to use RSpec source either, but I suspect the most
people would be satisfied with a main Subversion repository. Git users
can check out from / in to a Subversion repository just fine.
On Nov 18, 2007 4:28 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 6:17 PM, Dan
On Nov 18, 2007 6:17 PM, Daniel N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please use Git. I've just got to know it ;)
>
Please use Mercurial. I've just got to know it. ;)
(Actually, I don't much mind; I have Mercurial installed, but I don't have
to interact with rspec source control often enough to min
On Nov 19, 2007 8:24 AM, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
> > to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
> > tracki
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
> to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
> tracking there. We've already got the account set up and will soon
> make it public.
>
Hey all,
I'm very happy to announce that ActiveReload[1] has generously offered
to sponsor a lighthouse[2] account for rspec. We'll be moving ticket
tracking there. We've already got the account set up and will soon
make it public.
We're also going to be getting a sponsored slice at Engine Yard[3
13 matches
Mail list logo
