Say I do:
```ruby
object.method 5.days.ago
```
In the test I want to test using should_receive like:
```ruby
object.should_receive(:method).with(5.days.ago)
```
This will fail since two time objects aren't exact the same.
What is the general pattern for testing this in rspec?
Thanks
_
For rspec 2.0, is there anyway we can specify which file the output should be
written into when using html formatter easily? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Ok, I guess in reality it will never make a difference if a predicate
returns a nil or a false.
The behavior annoys me a little bit when I write a test that passes
when the method itself does nothing (so that it returns nil). Any
thoughts?
Thanks
Yi
On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:06 AM, David
Sorry for the spam, but I was wrong: the *should_not have_something*
also passed when the method returned nil.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Yi Wen wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that if I have a method named has_somthing? and I do:
object.should_not have_somthing and it failed (as expected) when
? returns nil
Is this intended behavior or something I did was wrong? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hi,
I had a couple features failed with cucumber 0.3.90 because
table.hashes is frozen so I cannot change the hashes anymore. Just
wonder what's the reason behind the change? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforg
There is a validation error, which means you were trying to save the
object somewhere. Check both your tests and code, to find out where.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Michael wrote:
Simply testing that my validations are working for a model called
Project.
MODEL
class Project < ActiveRecord
They are regex.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Chris Sund wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I've been working my way through the Rspec book trying to absorb and
understand everything. This is my first time with BDD and I'm just
trying to figure out some simple syntax stuff. My questions revolve
around some of
Yup, removing the condition fixed the problem. Thanks!
On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:34 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:33 AM, David
Chelimsky wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Yi Wen wrote:
Hello,
I has spork 0.5.0 and worked fine. now I updated to spork 0.5.7
which
5.7/bin/../lib/
spork/runner.rb:10:in `run'
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/timcharper-spork-0.5.7/bin/spork:11
/usr/local/bin/spork:19:in `load'
/usr/local/bin/spork:19
It's missing application_controller. THe environment.rb is loaded
before require 'spec/rails'. Any ide
I do this:
Fixtures.reset_cache
fixtures_folder = File.join(RAILS_ROOT, 'test', 'fixtures')
fixtures = Dir[File.join(fixtures_folder, '*.yml')].map {|f|
File.basename(f, '.yml') }
fixture_class_names = {} # or whatever needed
Fixtures.create_fixtures(fixtures_folder, fixtures, fixture_class_names)
Hi,
How can I test flash.now[:key] is being set in a controller test? Both
flash[:key] and flash.now[:key].should == message didn't work
I can use response.session["flash"][:key].should == message . Just looks bad
Thanks
Yi
--
http://yiwenandsoftwar
Just did a little bit exploration. Found out
http://github.com/carlosbrando/remarkable/tree/master plugin I use actually
cause the problem. This plugin also broke spec:server:start rake task as
well. :-(
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Yi wrote:
> I thought be_something is actually handled
I thought be_something is actually handled by rspec class Be. be_blank
essentially asks the object blank? predicate. Not that there is a "be_blank"
method declared anywhere.
Anyway, require 'spec/expectations' doesn't solve the problem. I will look
into this. Thanks
Yi
re 'webrat/core/matchers'
The only thing different is:
config.application_address= "myapp.local"
I tried to comment out this line and it didn't help anyway.
I did script/generate cucumber and it didn't help. :(
Yi
2009/3/19 aslak hellesoy
>
>
> 2009/3/19 Yi
undefined method `be_blank' for
# (NoMethodError)
features/create_account.feature:10:in `And the account should be
created'
I print out the account class, which is a AR::B. Why cucumber tells me it is
a ActionController::Integration::Session?
I use cucumber 0.2 and rspec 1.2 with Ra
Hi,
If I do something like this:
before(:each) do
@test_class = Class.new do
blahblah
end
end
I will get one extra test shown:
MyTest
- test_class
Where did I go wrong for this?
Thanks
Yi
--
http://yiwenandsoftware.wordpress.com
David, thanks very much
Yi
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:21 PM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Yi wrote:
> >>
oller"=>"users"}>, difference: <{"action"=>"destroy"}>
But assert_generates from rails works fine.
I myself never used route_for helper before. So I am not sure is this is the
problem of the method, or restful_authentication author misused it, or rails
2.3RC2 breaks it.
Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Could you just try it?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> Well I'm reading the 0.4.2 webrat rdoc for fill_in, at it says:
> "field can be either the value of a name attribute (i.e. user[email]) or
> the text inside a element that points at the field."
>
> Does it also try the
It does take id. At least in the trunk webrat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Steve Molitor wrote:
> Is there a way to locate and 'fill in' a text field (or check a check box,
> select an option, etc.) by id? It seems that the fill_in method takes
> either the text of the label pointing to the
Great writing. Thanks
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Dan North wrote:
> 2009/2/24 aslak hellesoy
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Rob Holland
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>> >
>> >> You can even use git commit --amend to commit on red (e.g at the en
Unfortunately, it doesn't solve the problem. Thanks anyway
Yi
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and
> it
> >
now is the
perfect time to do so. Thanks!
Yi
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:04 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and
> it
> > is the only error. no stack t
The following statement gave me "wrong number of arguments (2 for 1)" and it
is the only error. no stack trace.
presenter.stub!(:account).and_return account
any idea? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforg
I have edge rails along with RSpec 1.1.99. works fine. What errors do you
get?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:24 PM, George Anderson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm failing miserably to get RSpec running with edge rails (2.3 RC1).
> I've tried building/installing the 1.1.99.1 gems from David's git
> repos (http:
yeah, you guys are probably right on this. I was just over stating. :)
Yi
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Phlip wrote:
> Yi Wen wrote:
>
> I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of
>> use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall.
>>
tests passing as checkin points.
Thanks
Yi
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:36 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > The rhythm for wrking with cucumber advertised by http://cukes.info/ is
> to
> > write tests that fails first, then code that fi
I totally agree with you on this. I have a feeling a lot of people kind of
use cucumber as a sexy way for doing waterfall.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mark Wilden wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, aslak hellesoy
> wrote:
> > You don't have to write all
> > scenarios when you start
cucumber
test remains broken. What do we do then? We cannot check in any code because
that'll break the build. So we can only checkin code after several days? It
doesn't sound right to me. Any takes on this issue? Thanks in advance.
Yi
___
r
idates_presence_of).with(:email)
I am not really advocating the view of mockists. Just throw a question here.
:)
Yi
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> >
> > Without this syntax sugar, we still have to test val
m not a huge fan of "spec contract" for unit testing. Unit testing is a
tool for developers to write better, DRY-er and more loosely-coupled code.
At most it is a communication tool among developers. It's never meant to be
for non-technical / clients / business people. Cucumber might serve
ah! sorry, my bad. Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:56 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> > Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a typo. It should be
> >it {should validate_presence_of(:login)}
> > It still didn'
Sorry for the spam, I relized there was a typo. It should be
it {should validate_presence_of(:login)}
It still didn't work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> according to this post:
> http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2009/1/13/rspec-1-1-12-is-rele
wrong? Thanks for helping.
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
the state of things today."
And I haven't seen any update on this issue since then. But according to this
site <http://isitruby19.com/rspec>, RSpec works under Ruby 1.9.
So Is there any "official" response on this issue?
Thanks
Yi
__
This "Fu" you refer to is actually different than "Fu" as in "Kung-Fu". The
fu as in kung-fu by itself, means husband. In Ancient Chinese, it also means
wise person, such as confucius(Kong Fu Zi).
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:06 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:49 AM, James Byr
belongs
to Service layer though.
Yi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Looking at generated controller specs we tend to get something like
>
> describe PostsController do
> describe "handling GET /posts" do
>
> before(:each) do
>
Scenario lacks a "line" argument when calling add_scenario
Yi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I am trying to get some old "rbehave" scripts working with cucumber. I am
> running into an error. I get the same error when I
tant Spec::Rake
/home/ywen/projects/kod/Rakefile:10
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
Thanks
yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I agree. I have seen way too many times selenium tests are OK but bugs
appear in production. Not only should we run selenium tests against
production environment, but also they should be run on a production like
environment, such as, same OS, same setting (behind Apache, or whatever HTTP
servers, e
ic in that class and you can unit
testing this new public method.
Yi
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Anita Anita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I test private methods directly?
> Or should I pass by the methods that are calling these private methods?
> Or can
= http.request(req)
}
end
run_path and use_ssl_for_run are both instance methods. run
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Chuck Remes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Yi Wen wrote:
>
> By external resources, I mean, the code start a http connection and G
be like the method itself, except all the calls will be replaced by stub! or
should_receive.
I made this method as simple as possible. There is no *if* statements or
loop in the method, should I just NOT test this one?
Thanks for any ideas
Yi
___
rspec
Actually, for the completeness. please see this:
http://yiwenandsoftware.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/intergrate-rspec-story-runner-in-cruisecontrolrb-build-with-html-report/
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Yi Wen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes. -f html
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 200
yes. -f html
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:41 AM, aidy lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > >
> >
> > ruby stories/all.rb -c
> >
>
> Fantastic. Is it possible to create HTML from this?
>
> Aidy
> ___
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rub
+1. This is a smart.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Steve Eley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:45 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> So - how bad do you think this would suck to remove that feature? Are you
>> using it yourself?
>
> I'm not, but would it be
Does it
possible to DRY up it a little bit by putting Given up to right after
Story part? Or it is just too crazy?
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
/Stories/.
Just wonder is this the right way to do it? or there is a
better/preferred way? Thanks
Yi
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
That's because you executed the same creation code into the
script/console, which has nothing to do with RSpec, and still get the
same error message, right?
Yi
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:56 AM, Csongor Bartus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yi Wen wrote:
>> Well, at least now we
:26 AM, Csongor Bartus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yi Wen wrote:
>> You don't have attr_accessor :password, :password_confirmation in
>> User, do you? You may want to add this and try again
>
> I had :password, I've added :password_confirmation but still th
You don't have attr_accessor :password, :password_confirmation in
User, do you? You may want to add this and try again
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Csongor Bartus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yi Wen wrote:
>> fire up script/console and copy line 82 and try it out. and
fire up script/console and copy line 82 and try it out. and report the
result here.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Csongor Bartus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>>
>> Try using create! or save! - I'll bet the record is not being saved
>> correctly and you're not seeing th
user.should_receive(:encrypt_password).with(your_password)
user.save
Is this what you want?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Csongor Bartus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i'm learning rspec and i can't figure out how to test if a callback is
> executed in a model.
>
> my model code is:
I use http-access2 (http://dev.ctor.org/http-access2) for make requests.
I also have a custom WebServiceExampleGroup to do setup work there.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Pol Llovet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in this also, anyone out there have some best practices?
>
> --
> Po
on web services. What's the "standard way" of doing
it?
Yi
On 23 May 2008, at 19:53, Yi Wen wrote:
> It's not in the database. It looks to me the data is not actually
> inserted into the DB at all, just somehow buffered somewhere.
It's stored in a transaction, so
to me the
data is not actually inserted into the DB at all, just somehow buffered
somewhere. Would anybody know why? thanks.
Now the workaround is to have a separate class doing all DB operations, but
I am still curious why RSpec does this, for speed reason
57 matches
Mail list logo
