Yes, I do know about .should_not, and the example should be written
that way. So the following
[].should_not == []
'string'.should_not == 'string'
do fail. But I'm trying to understand why they pass with .should !=
Willy
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Willy...
Should
I've tried searching around for something describing how the #should
method works with the != operator, but couldn't find anything
conclusive. Can someone please explain while the following lines will
pass if placed into an rspec example?
it "should fail but passes" do
[].should != []
