On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a matcher in my head for a couple months, that I frequently
> want but never get around to writing because I can't think of the name
> for it. Here's how it would look
>
> [1, 2, 3, 4, 1].should ... [1, 3, 1, 4, 2]
I presume the feature is well tested in rails and disable it in the
test environment (which is done by default, I think).
# in config/environments/test.rb
# Disable request forgery protection in test environment
config.action_controller.allow_forgery_protection= false
-Mike
On Sat, Mar 15, 2
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> test
1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On 10/24/07, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2007, at 6:07 am, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > The following only affects people who have bravely begun to experiment
> > with the 2 day-old plain text story runner and definable groups of
> > steps.
>
>
> Ok, *now* I'm allowed to
AWESOME. :)
On 10/21/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to discussions on this list, suggestions from many of you and a
> patch from Pat Maddox, we now have Plain Text User Stories in Story
> Runner.
>
> Read more:
>
> http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/articles/2007/10/21/story-r
On 10/15/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having this expression of stories and scenarios appearing devoid of
> programmatic ideas has great potential to help the customers feel
> ownership over stories/scenarios. Of course, there is an underlying
> relationship to syntax that they'
