Hi list,
I've used DatabaseCleaner in the past, but only when using Cucumber
and Selenium (or Steak + Celerity) since turning on
transactional_fixtures would prevent the data being accessible from
app-server that is also triggered for the tests. This works fine, and
is a de-facto solution for this
I meant rspec1.x :)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still on the Rails 2 era.. so, it worked like a charm with
> response.should be_redirect.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marcelo.
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 201
I'm still on the Rails 2 era.. so, it worked like a charm with
response.should be_redirect.
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:33 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Davi
Thanks David! :)
Marcelo.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
> wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > Quick question: How could I just test if a redirect was made, without URL
> > what
Hello guys,
Quick question: How could I just test if a redirect was made, without URL
whatsoever?
Thanks,
Marcelo.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Thanks Wincent, I'll do that.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> El 22/06/2010, a las 08:16, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa escribió:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I have noted a few problems when using rake spec. First, it doesn't seem
>
Hello list,
I have noted a few problems when using rake spec. First, it doesn't seem to
load the gems from the Gemfile (:test group) I had to add a required for
each gem in this group on the spec_helper.rb file when I tried to run the
tests vai rake spec, if I use the spec command, it works as exp
or #1. Or am I
missing something?
Thanks!
Marcelo.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:18 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> One thing that just came to my mind is to fake the requests on the app
> server instance. One simple way to do
the spec that needs it.
Any other ideas?
Marcelo.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have an acceptance test that aims to bdd a Google Apps OpenID
> authentication feature. This login screen also uses so
Hello all,
I have an acceptance test that aims to bdd a Google Apps OpenID
authentication feature. This login screen also uses some JS (in order to
switch between the regular / Google OpenID forms). Now, I know this is not
something that would prevent me from using the :rack driver for Capybara,
b
Ah, got it!
Thanks for your patience, David ;)
Cheers,
Marcelo.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:05 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> Yes,
>
> That's what I want to do, but my code is a little bit d
Oh, the code in the before/after blocks is wrapped in a if options[:js].
Forgot to write it.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes,
>
> That's what I want to do, but my code is a little bit diff
e an object from the ruby
instance running the specs, and put a breakpoint, I can't see the data
outside of it :(
Any ideas?
Marcelo.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:47 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Yeah, I&
e_transactional_fixtures = true
> end
> end
>
> end
>
Check the lines "config.use_transactional_fixtures" on both callbacks. I
doesn't seem to disable them. Any ideas?
Marcelo.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:32 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 5:
Ah!
Thanks for the heads up about heads out ;)
Obrigado,
Marcelo.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Por nada!
>
> ps - em inglês, a frase é "heads up" :)
>
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 5:27 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> Thanks for the
Thanks for the heads out, David :)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:05 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> > On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:40 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys.
> >>
> >
Hey all,
I have replaced Cucumber with Steak and I like the experience so far. It is
not as polished as Cucumber in what comes to configuration, but it is
simpler and covers my needs perfectly. I've followed the trick to pass a
hash to the example in order to setup Capybara to use a different driv
hat class.
>
> * example_group, context, and describe all mean the same thing.
>
> * example, specify, and it all mean the same thing
>
> HTH,
> David
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
> Ah! I thought I could use it / describe / context interchangeably
Hey guys.
I would like to test the following behavior:
render :update do |page|
page.replace_html 'errors', :partial => 'signup_errors', :locals
=> { :errors => 'errors'}
end
}
I'm doing:
controller.should_receive(:render).with(:update)
But I am not sure on
Ah! I thought I could use it / describe / context interchangeably.
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Trey Bean wrote:
> It looks like you need to put those lines in an it block.
>
> it 'should...' do
> token...
> end
>
> Trey
>
> On Jun 14
Hello list,
I have this very simple model spec:
require 'spec_helper'
describe Token do
describe "Associations" do
token = Token.new
token.should respond_to(:user)
end
end
When I run it, I get the following error:
/spec/models/token_spec.rb:7: undefined method `respond_to' for
Spec
gt;> invoking #current_user=. When you do call self, which refers to the object
>> itself, it will use normal method lookup, that will find your
>> #current_user=.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
>> celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
&
Hello,
This could be rephrased as -- How to test calls of special assigment
(setter) methods?
I am trying to test the assigmnet of a user object to the
current_user=(new_user) method. It is part of an authentication process and
finally the object is assigned to the session through this method. I
ntroller#update on (snip)
*No action responded to /users/89*. Actions: (snip)
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
> On 2010-04-25 5:52 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I have a controller example that look
Hello list,
I have a controller example that looks like this:
it 'Should update (PUT /users/:id)' do
@attributes = @user.attributes
@attributes[:firstname] = "Another one"
lambda {
put user_url(@user),@attributes
User.find(@user.id).firstname == @attributes[:
For example, I have this scenario where a Directory model will only save if
it can connect to the LDAP server. In a test I'm writting, though,
connecting to the LDAP server is not relevant, so I tried doing this:
context "LDAP is on" do
before(:each) do
Directory.stub!(:authent
Hello guys,
I was spec'ing a model and just tried to do something like this
it "should create a payment with period_start & period_end set
correctly" do
it "should create a new payment for an approved transaction"
previous_payment = Payment.find(Payment.last.id-1)
jus
Why don't you open the class, and set the constant like so:
class TheClass
CONSTANT = 'value_it_should_have_for_the_current_spec'
end
This worked for me.
Marcelo.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
> On 2008-10-16, at 15:12, Craig Demyanovich wrote:
>
>> Cool. Having seen
Yes, thanks, David!
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
> celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I had a hard time to find out a way to mock the singleton feed method of
Yeah, thanks David :)
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <
> celose...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I had a hard time to find out a way to mock the singleton feed
Hello list,
I had a hard time to find out a way to mock the singleton feed method of the
following class:
class RssReader
def self.feed(feed_url)
output = []
open(feed_url) do |http|
response = http.read
result = RSS::Parser.parse(response, false)
result.items.each_wit
Hello list,
One of my Cucumber features rely havily in Selenium (used through WebRat)
and since I'm accessing external data-sources (a web-service) I decided the
best way would be to mock this specific component and provide a fixture out
of it. The mocking/stubbing is easy, I'm already familiar wi
Hello list,
Since stubs don't set expectations, do we have any use-case where stubbing
like this makes sense:
@mock.stub!(:method).with(anything()).and_return(@collection).
It is clear that and_return is the value from stubbing, but the with doesn't
make any sense, in case, IMO.
Thanks,
Marcel
ude patches or even just copy and
paste.
Or maybe we should just use branches, but won't be easy to convince
the management to do this now.
Does that make sense?
Thanks again,
Marcelo.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Marcelo de Moraes
Hello list,
I'm working in a big project in the company I'm working on as a "BDD
tech lead", this means I'm leading the implementation of BDD in
ongoing projects, most of them did not use BDD from the start.
I implemented the policy of "Only commit if all your tests are
passing", this in all test
s the whole
idea of installing them as plugins. However, script/cucumber is still
trying to find system-wide gems.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Marcelo de Moraes
> Serpa wrote:
>> Hello list,
>&g
Hello list,
When installing Webrat as a plugin, do I need to change the "require
'webrat'" to point to the absolute directory in which webrat is
installed in the vendor/plugins folder or is there any implicit logic
in the require that I am missing? I didn't find anything in the rSpec
book about th
Hey list,
Let's say I have a model, and I want to setup a partial mock in it, to
set the expectation that it should receive a message with specific
arguments. I know that this is not a good design for a spec, and that
I would probably need to separate this in another example -- but let's
say that
ue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:39, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>
>> Hey list!
>>
>> Let's say I have a user story for authentication/login.
>>
>> I have seen many cucumber scenarios like this:
>&g
Hey list!
Let's say I have a user story for authentication/login.
I have seen many cucumber scenarios like this:
Scenario: User logs in succesfully
Given I am not authenticated
When I go to the login page
...
>From what I have seen, the Given steps that check that the user is not
authenticated
leMethods#stub
Thanks,
Marcelo.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Marcelo de Moraes
Serpa wrote:
> Thanks David and Ben for the comprehensive replies! I really appreciate it :)
>
> These wikipedia articles helped me to understand on the more conceptual level:
>
> http://en.wikipe
best way to use them.
My 0.4 cents of Brazilian Reals.
@David -- yes, I'm Brazilian! You've got a good gut! And I'm glad to
see that you know Portuguese! :)
Marcelo.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:47 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jul 23, 7:41 pm, Ben Mabey wrote:
>>
Hello list,
>From what I could see, the lines between mocks and stubs are subtle,
but the general idea I got is that mocks set expectations and stubs
are only dummy objects/method calls. What confused me though, is that
the stub() method is an alias for mock() in
Spec::Mocks::ExampleMethods. So a
Hello list!
In my efforts of following BDD in a disciplined manner, I found myself
needing to spec a Rails action.
The behavior I wanted to test was: "This controller should handle the
index action", and since it is not good practice to go to the
implementation before specing, I decided to spec t
Thank you all for the replies!
>I use Cucumber for specifying application behaviour and RSpec for
>specifying lower level component behaviour. In the scenario you
>describe:
>* the application's job is to show only the active products
>* the view's job is to display any products it is given by the
Hello list,
I have an example/spec that relates to the Product#index view and
says "it should display only the active products". The thing is the
logic to filter the active products should be in the model, and not on
the view, since the view should be "dumb". I just realized that, and
what I thin
Thanks David, I added a .autotest file in my project root path and the new
mapping. It worked like a charm!
Marcelo.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:34 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
We are creating tests for presenters (presenter pattern) classes. We are
putting the implementation classes in app/presenters and we thought on
putting the specs in spec/presenters. Question is, how could I extend the
autotest discover rules so that it will also monitor the presenter classe
48 matches
Mail list logo
