Re: [rspec-users] Am I missing something with Heckle?

2007-10-31 Thread Jim Deville
You too! On Oct 31, 2007, at 2:25 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Oct 31, 2007 4:20 PM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's like leaving things you need to take to work next to your car >> keys. > > If only I could remember where I put the damned car keys! > _

Re: [rspec-users] Rspec Release Plan (was Am I missing something with Heckle?)

2007-10-31 Thread Jim Deville
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Ashley Moran wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2007, at 4:53 pm, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> We're going to a release model in which 1.odd.x will be considered >> experimental. This means that while we will document code-breaking >> changes in subsequent releases (so you know wh

Re: [rspec-users] Zentest and rspec

2007-09-23 Thread Jim Deville
If you're on Mac and a fan of Growl, you can also check out an article I wrote/updated at http://devillecompanies.org/2007/08/14/ growl-autotest-and-rspec-108 Enjoy. Jim Deville On Sep 19, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Jim Freeze wrote: On 9/19/07, Lance Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [rspec-users] issue with edge rails and urls

2007-08-27 Thread Jim Deville
On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:52 PM, J.D. Hollis wrote: > I just switched our project over to Edge Rails, and I'm running into > this problem with all of my helper methods that call _url methods: > > NoMethodError in 'ApplicationHelper home_link should generate a valid > home link when User.current and

Re: [rspec-users] Foreign key constraints, fixtures, and rake task

2007-08-27 Thread Jim Deville
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:08 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On 8/27/07, Jay Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tilmann Singer wrote: >>> * Jay Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070827 03:51]: What's rake doing differently? >>> >>> rake spec isn't doing anything fundamentally different, but the >>>

Re: [rspec-users] Keeping unit tests from hitting the DB

2007-08-24 Thread Jim Deville
On Aug 23, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Pat Maddox wrote: > On 8/23/07, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of >>> splitting >>> up non-db-reliant behavior specs from th

Re: [rspec-users] Keeping unit tests from hitting the DB

2007-08-23 Thread Jim Deville
> As far as model specs go...I've been toying with the idea of splitting > up non-db-reliant behavior specs from the specs that do require the > database. When you want to specify behavior you can just stub out the > columns (because AR does try to hit the db to find the column info). > Obvio