msky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 17, 2007 9:06 AM, Jeroen Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... Just received the message by David. This will be fixed in 1.1.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> ... Just received the message by David. This will be fixed in 1.1.1
>
> Jeroen - just for good measure, would you kindly update from trunk and
> verify that it does in fact fix your issue?
Finished in 3.42683 seconds
176 examples, 0 failures, 3 pending
:)
___
>
> I don't see a fixtures :users in your spec. Do you have this in your
> spec_helper?
Not using fixtures in this particular spec
> Have you rerun script/generate rspec after you upgraded?
Yes, but manually copied over the changes in spec_helper.rb
> There are some changes in the spec_helper
>
> This is actually a regression in 1.1.0 that has been fixed in trunk.
> We'll do a 1.1.1 release later today, but go ahead and update to trunk
> for the time being and you should be good.
>
Great, thanks. Will I get 1.1.1 automatically if I'm using svn:externals and
the CURRENT tag?
jeroen
gins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:87
:in `run_examples'
/Users/jeroen/lostboys.nl/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/command_line.
rb:19:in `run'
./script/spec:4:
Finished in 0.391897 seconds
25 examples, 1 failure, 1 pending
On 12/17/07 3:17 PM, "aslak hellesoy" &l
Hi,
I just moved from 1.08 to 1.10 and now have one example failing, which,
under 1.08, passed. Is the due to a change in behaviour?
Here's my spec (removed some passing examples)
require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../spec_helper'
describe "A user" do
before(:each) do
@user = User.new
Which versions (rspec and tmbundle) should we use with rails 2 (stable)? Can
we just keep using rspec 1.08 with rails2? I noticed running specs from
textmate with rails2 throws some errors.
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.0.1/lib/active_support/dep
endencies.rb:263:in `load_miss
On 12/10/07 6:55 PM, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 11:42 AM, Brandon Keepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> Did you ever get a chance to look at this to see if I am missing
>> something obvious. I'm getting these errors randomly.
>
> Haven't yet.
