Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Ed Keith wrote:
> What about...Ruby?
>
> I think it would make a lot of sense to define a couple hashes/objects
> that represent each compiler. If you're just using different strings,
> you can use a hash.
&g
Rake has been on my list of tools to learn for a while not. This might
be the time.
Thank you.
-EdK
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Ashley Moran wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2009, at 17:44, Ed Keith wrote:
> You don't provide enough information for me to be sure, but what you
> describe sounds sufficiently high-level enough to make Cucumber[1]
> worth looking into.
>
> If you search the archives of this l
I have very little experience with Ruby. I am using RSpec to test a
cross platform C++ library. I am using a shell script (and batch file)
to run the tests with several different compilers.
I do no want to put the details of the different compilers in the RSpec
files, but am thinking about rewriti
