For sake of completeness, if you are using bundle in rails3, and don't
want to invoke rake [to save init time], you can also execute it the
following way:
bundle exec cucumber --guess --profile default
path/feature_name.feature:line_number
HTH
Nishith
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/
For sake of completness, if you are using bundle in rails3, and don't
want to invoke rake [to save init time], you can also execute it the
following way:
bundle exec cucumber --guess --profile default
path/feature_name.feature:line_number
HTH
Nishith
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Aug 23, 1:55 pm, Justin Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, ct9a wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Justin.
>
> > I have the part object mocked up before each spec runs.
>
> > --- Extract begins -
>
> > let(:part){
> > mock_model('Part').as_null_object
> > }
>
> >
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, ct9a wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Justin.
>
> I have the part object mocked up before each spec runs.
>
> --- Extract begins -
>
>let(:part){
>mock_model('Part').as_null_object
>}
>
>before do
>Part.stub(:new).and_return(par
Thanks, Justin.
I have the part object mocked up before each spec runs.
--- Extract begins -
let(:part){
mock_model('Part').as_null_object
}
before do
Part.stub(:new).and_return(part)
end
--- Extract ends -
With that i
I've come across an interesting blog post showing how to inherit
tests:
http://benbiddington.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/rspec-common-base-specs/
How does it stack against the usual mixing/shared_examples_for,
beautifully described in
http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/2010/11/07/specifying-mixins-with
JRuby 1.6.2
rspec-core (2.6.4)
rspec-expectations (2.6.0)
rspec-mocks (2.6.0)
rspec-rails (2.6.1)
I'm sure this has more to do with the way JRuby wraps Java exceptions but I
figured I'd post here in case anyone here has any insight or pointers. In the
context of writing a spec for a model like t
On 22 Aug 2011, at 14:10, Chuck Remes wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 9:11 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> It's growing increasingly difficult for RSpec to support Ruby 1.8.6 as other
>> libraries that rspec's development environment relies on drop support.
>> Noting that 1.8.7 was
On Aug 21, 2011, at 9:11 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> It's growing increasingly difficult for RSpec to support Ruby 1.8.6 as other
> libraries that rspec's development environment relies on drop support. Noting
> that 1.8.7 was released over three years ago (6/1/2008), I'd like to
* David Chelimsky [2011-08-22]:
> This means that you need to explicitly stub the load method to do what
> you're trying to do:
>
> let(:bar) { mock(Bar, :load => nil).as_null_object }
Thanks for the explanation, David. I wasn't sure whether or not this was
accepted behaviour, I would have expec
On Aug 22, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange problem with mocking an object that has a method called
> 'load'. With Rails 2.3 and rspec-rails 1.3 I could do sth like this:
>
> describe Foo do
> let(:bar) { mock(Bar).as_null_object }
> before(:each) do
>Bar.s
Hi,
I have a strange problem with mocking an object that has a method called
'load'. With Rails 2.3 and rspec-rails 1.3 I could do sth like this:
describe Foo do
let(:bar) { mock(Bar).as_null_object }
before(:each) do
Bar.stub(:new).and_return(bar)
end
it 'does something' do
Foo.
Hi David,
Sounds good to me. I haven't seen a 1.8.6 project since December last year.
Best,
Sidu.
http://c42.in
http://blog.sidu.in
On 22 August 2011 07:41, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> It's growing increasingly difficult for RSpec to support Ruby 1.8.6 as other
> libraries that rspe
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:14 AM, ct9a wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> After reading the rspec book (dec 2010 edition), I went on to write
> controller specs for an application I'm porting over from rails 2.3.x
> to rails 3.
>
>
> 1) I ran 'rake routes' and got the following:
>
>parts GET/parts(.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 7:53 PM, braver wrote:
> I've come across an interesting blog post showing how to inherit
> tests:
>
> http://benbiddington.wordpress.com/2010/11/06/rspec-common-base-specs/
>
> How does it stack against the usual mixing/shared_examples_for,
> beautifully described in
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
