Re: [rspec-users] functional testing with(through?) chrome

Thank you. I'll check it out. John -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] named context or calling include_context with block?

On Aug 6, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > On Aug 6, 8:56 am, David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: >> >>> Hello, >> >>> I'm playing around with Rspec again after going from test/unit to >>> rspec then back to test/unit... :) Righ

Re: [rspec-users] named context or calling include_context with block?

Hey, Maybe I'm reading that wrong, but that's not exactly what I want to do. In my example, when I call the shared context, I'm passing it a block. Neither include_context or include_examples take a block when called. Thanks. On Aug 6, 8:56 am, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:55

Re: [rspec-users] named context or calling include_context with block?

On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > Hello, > > I'm playing around with Rspec again after going from test/unit to > rspec then back to test/unit... :) Right off the bat, I find myself > wanting to do something like this: https://gist.github.com/1128091 > > Basically, I w

[rspec-users] named context or calling include_context with block?

Hello, I'm playing around with Rspec again after going from test/unit to rspec then back to test/unit... :) Right off the bat, I find myself wanting to do something like this: https://gist.github.com/1128091 Basically, I want to name a context, then call it later by name, passing a block to it.