Re: [rspec-users] Error running rspec on Debian

I just wanted to confirm that you've verified that the exact same codebase has its specs run correctly on a different OS (or flavour of linux, even)? Best, Sidu. http://c42.in http://about.me/ponnappa On 29 March 2011 06:34, Carlos Torres wrote: > I'm new to Rails and I was planning on trying

Re: [rspec-users] Autotest Parallel Support

On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:53 PM, snelson wrote: > I have a commit to add support for the -p (parallel) option to > autotest, which is a feature provided by @grosser's autotest fork. > > The discussion is here: https://github.com/grosser/autotest/issues/#issue/13 > The commit is here: > https://githu

Re: [rspec-users] Can't put shared example group in its own file

On 28 Mar 2011, at 04:04, Mike T wrote: > Any ideas? All I'd like to do is have two specs in different files use the > same shared example group. I saw a similar thread about autotest, but I am > not using that. > > $ uname -a > Darwin mbp.local 10.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.6.0: Wed Nov 10

[rspec-users] spec_helper aware of full test suite being run? After hook to run code after running all specs?

I use VCR to record interactions, and when the recordings change filenames, and directory structure, over time, as the test suite evolves, the old recordings, no longer used, are rarely pruned. I would like to have the ability to run rspec with an option to check for unused VCR recordings, and ano

[rspec-users] spec_helper aware of full test suite being run? After hook to run code after running all specs?

I use VCR to record interactions, and when the recordings change filenames, and directory structure, over time, as the test suite evolves, the old recordings, no longer used, are rarely pruned. I would like to have the ability to run rspec with an option to check for unused VCR recordings, and ano

[rspec-users] Can't put shared example group in its own file

Any ideas? All I'd like to do is have two specs in different files use the same shared example group. I saw a similar thread about autotest, but I am not using that. $ uname -a Darwin mbp.local 10.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.6.0: Wed Nov 10 18:13:17 PST 2010; root:xnu-1504.9.26~3/RELEASE_I386

[rspec-users] Rack application timed out during boot

Hi, I'm using Rspec + Capybara in Rails3. My integration tests went well today until I couldn't even access a page with simple requests such as: visit root_path With error: Rack application timed out during boot Any idea of what's going on? ___

[rspec-users] Error running rspec on Debian

I'm new to Rails and I was planning on trying out RSpec. When I try to execute the rspec command on Debian v6.0.1, I get the output below: k4ru050@DebianBox:~/Desktop/rails_projects/sample_app/spec$ bundle exec rspec spec/controllers /home/k4ru050/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p180@rails3tutorial/gems/rspe

[rspec-users] Bundler and Setting up RSpec

Hi there, Does RSpec acknowledge bundler, and use the groups? Also is there any good example of what is required for a function spec rake task... I've had issues trying to create my own. require 'rubygems' require 'bundler' Bundler.setup(:default, :test) begin require 'rspec/core/rake_task'

[rspec-users] Rails Rspec Capybara Testing Javascript

I'm testing a Rails 3 app with Rspec and Capybara. For my integration tests, I need to test javascript. Of course, I watched http://railscasts.com/episodes/257-request-specs-and-capybara which presents the basics very well. Unfortunately an error is raised in the javascript as I can see using sav

Re: [rspec-users] Rake generate - not generating spec files

I had a similar problem, then I noticed that I didn't include gem 'rspec-rails' in my development environment like what David mentioned above. That fixed the problem I had. I'm running the following stack: - rails 3.0.3 - - rake (0.8.7) - rspec 2.5.0 - rspec-rails 2.5.0 On Feb 23, 10

[rspec-users] [module announcement] Equivalency testing for XML

Hello all, I recently released a gem that assists in testing XML nodes for equivalency, and thought it might be of interest to the RSpec community. It can normalize whitespace (or not), ignore element order (or not), compare namespaces based on URI (not prefix), and more. Plus -- and possibly best

[rspec-users] Autotest Parallel Support

I have a commit to add support for the -p (parallel) option to autotest, which is a feature provided by @grosser's autotest fork. The discussion is here: https://github.com/grosser/autotest/issues/#issue/13 The commit is here: https://github.com/thisbythem/rspec-core/commit/de074af8ab19e432b3c7b3

[rspec-users] Can't put shared example group in its own file

Any ideas? All I'd like to do is have two specs in different files use the same shared example group. I saw a similar thread about autotest, but I am not using that. [Sorry for the double post on Google Groups; didn't realize at the time it was a read-only group.] $ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12

Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

On Apr 2, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote: > I use RSpec mock and stub like this: > > hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) > > This works fine, but when using this instead: > > hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } Not that it's really necessary, but to make this work you can do: hit = mock('h

Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

> hit = mock('hit') > hit.stub(:stored) { 5 } > hit.stored.should eq(5) > > Make sense? Of course :-) Thanks. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote: > I use RSpec mock and stub like this: > > hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) > > This works fine, but when using this instead: > > hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } > > then I get > > undefined method `stored' for # 0xb688bb78> > > I always th

[rspec-users] stubbing directly vs using stub method

I use RSpec mock and stub like this: hit = mock("hit", :stored => 5) This works fine, but when using this instead: hit = mock("hit").stub(:stored) { 5 } then I get undefined method `stored' for # I always thought both were equivalent. Can someone enlighten me? Regards, Kai __