David
Thanks!
Actually, match_unless_raises is probably the best solution for your
issue.
Then I found this page:
”Upgrade to 1.3.0 - Matcher DSL"
Upgrade.rdoc at master from dchelimsky's rspec - GitHub
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/blob/master/Upgrade.rdoc
and, I found the tentativ
David, it's been a while since I said Thank You, so I just want to say Thank
You for everything you do for rspec.
:)
--linoj
On Nov 28, 2010, at 5:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> ### rspec-core-2.2.0
>
> [full changelog](http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/compare/v2.1.0...master)
>
> * Depre
### rspec-core-2.2.0
[full changelog](http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/compare/v2.1.0...master)
* Deprecations/changes
* --debug/-d on command line is deprecated and now has no effect
* win32console is now ignored; Windows users must use ANSICON for color
support
(Bosko Ivanisevic)
*
On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:44 AM, James Palmer wrote:
> Under the older version of rspec, I'm able to run my script successfully
> by running "spec randomperform.rb"
>
> I've now installed the newest rspec, and it does not work for me. If I
> run the command:
>
> rspec randomperform.rb
>
> I get t
On Nov 25, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Kaoru Kobo wrote:
> Then I found this page:
>
> ”Upgrade to 1.3.0 - Matcher DSL"
> Upgrade.rdoc at master from dchelimsky's rspec - GitHub
> http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/blob/master/Upgrade.rdoc
>
>
> and, I found the tentative solution:
> (Is there the better
On Nov 28, 2010, at 2:06 AM, medihack wrote:
>> That's my 2¢, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise :)
>
> Ok, I'll give my best ... how about a dollar? ;-)
>
>> I understand that chains like this are common in Rails apps thanks to good
>> ideas like composable finders (which generally
Hello all,
I'm a long time Ruby and Rails user, but new to RSpec; I've been using
Shoulda instead.
I picked up the book "Service-Oriented Design with Ruby and
Rails" (http://amzn.to/9sgx99) which uses RSpec throughout. Despite
being published only a few months ago, it's already out of date.
Here
> That's my 2¢, but feel free to try to convince me otherwise :)
Ok, I'll give my best ... how about a dollar? ;-)
> I understand that chains like this are common in Rails apps thanks to good
> ideas like composable finders (which generally do not violate Demeter), but I
> don't think the paral
