Use ruby 1.9.2 - sorry on my iphone
On Nov 3, 4:49 pm, Rhett Sutphin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've converted a couple of my smaller libraries' spec suites to rspec 2 with
> no trouble. (I'm enjoying the new version -- thanks to all involved.) I'm
> trying to convert one a larger suite now and I've r
Hi,
I've converted a couple of my smaller libraries' spec suites to rspec 2 with no
trouble. (I'm enjoying the new version -- thanks to all involved.) I'm trying
to convert one a larger suite now and I've run into two problems on ruby 1.9.1
(but not 1.8.7) related to constant resolution in de
Didn't know there was one. I'll do that, thanks.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Any ideas on how to create models in the before(:suite) block in a
transaction, then not commit that transaction and roll it back in the
after(:suite) block?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.
On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Jon Kruger wrote:
> If I have a Background section and a Scenario Outline, the Background
> runs once before each example in the scenario outline. Is there a hook
> that before the Scenario Outline, but not before each example?
Please post Cucumber questions to the C
I should have mentioned this before, but I'm using fixtures in these
specs. When I took all of the fixtures out, I get the same before(:all)
behavior that you got. With them in, it seems whatever happens in the
before(:all) is rolled back before any examples run. Can you reproduce
that behavior
If I have a Background section and a Scenario Outline, the Background
runs once before each example in the scenario outline. Is there a hook
that before the Scenario Outline, but not before each example?
Jon
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
Humm, I did not know about the run_all_when_everything_filtered option. It's
very useful for me…
--
LAILSON BANDEIRA
http://lailsonbandeira.com/
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Toni Tuominen wrote:
> Ok, thanks. That functionality is enough for me for now at least.
>
> - Toni
>
> On Wed, Nov 3
Ok, thanks. That functionality is enough for me for now at least.
- Toni
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Toni Tuominen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to make a rake task to run examples with a certain
>> filter on? In this case I want to
On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Toni Tuominen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to make a rake task to run examples with a certain
> filter on? In this case I want to run rake spec:focused and run only
> the examples with :focus => true.
Not yet. Right now (2.0.1) the only way to define filters is in
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Arco wrote:
> Just curious if this was ever fixed??
The rails ticket (linked below) says it is still open. If you want to stay
informed about it, just go to the ticket and click "Watch Ticket". You'll get
an email any time it is updated.
Cheers,
David
> On Jul 13,
That worked. Thanks a lot.
Wish you speedy recovery Justin.
take care.
On Nov 2, 10:13 pm, Justin Ko wrote:
> I'm under the weather so I won't be able to give you a thorough
> answer.
>
> #let - The block is executed when you call it.
> #let! - The block is "wrapped" in a before(:each) filter.
Hi,
Is it possible to make a rake task to run examples with a certain
filter on? In this case I want to run rake spec:focused and run only
the examples with :focus => true.
- Toni
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.o
13 matches
Mail list logo
