On 31 Jul 2010, at 7:06 PM, Myron Marston wrote:
> Good point--I hadn't thought of that. The one issue I see with it is
> that the author of the shared example group may not have knowledge of
> which helper methods consumers will need to override. So he/she
> either defines all helper methods t
> You can still get the same outcome, but you have to implement it in the group
> like this:
> unless defined?(:foo)
> def foo; "foo"; end
> end
Good point--I hadn't thought of that. The one issue I see with it is
that the author of the shared example group may not have knowledge of
which help
On 31 Jul 2010, at 2:08 AM, nruth wrote:
> Re: error / warning message, at the same scope (i.e. an accident, as
> in the op) then yes that could be quite useful for spotting mistakes.
> I'm not so sure about in different blocks though, it's probably
> intentional there (different context).
I for
On 31 Jul 2010, at 2:08 AM, nruth wrote:
> If I want to set up a context to run some examples in (models created
> with machinist, associations, etc) then the before block makes it
> clear that that's the state the examples are running against, and the
> @vars give me a (quick and dirty?) hook to
On 31 Jul 2010, at 1:10 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> You can still get the same outcome, but you have to implement it in the group
> like this:
>
> unless defined?(:foo)
> def foo; "foo"; end
> end
Maybe a DSL method while I'm working on it? Maybe:
default_helper(:foo) do
"foo"
end
