Re: [rspec-users] more rspec questions

2010-04-28 Thread Patrick J. Collins
> I would go a step further and say that adding an address to card is > not very interesting (Just like iterating over addresses, adding them > should work out of the box assuming Ruby itself isn't broken.) Well, I ended up restructuring my code and I wrote tests for everything I thought were impo

Re: [rspec-users] more rspec questions

2010-04-28 Thread Adam Sroka
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: >> If something in the code you are testing depends on the return value >> of a method then you would use a stub. e.g.: > Right, but what I am asking is---  if all of my "slave methods" are relying on > stored card data from the @card inst

Re: [rspec-users] rcov not working?

2010-04-28 Thread Jay McGaffigan
It looks like it can't find Rcov... do you have rcov installed? can you rcov --help from a command line? Thanks Jay On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Patrick J. Collins wrote: > I followed the instructions in the rspec book to setup rcov.  I appened to > the end of my RAILS_ROOT/Rakefile: > re

[rspec-users] rcov not working?

2010-04-28 Thread Patrick J. Collins
I followed the instructions in the rspec book to setup rcov. I appened to the end of my RAILS_ROOT/Rakefile: require 'rake' require 'spec/rake/spectask' namespace :spec do desc "Run specs with RCov" Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new('rcov') do |t| t.spec_files = FileList['spec/**/

Re: [rspec-users] .size.should === (4..5)

2010-04-28 Thread aidy lewis
On 28 April 2010 19:01, David Chelimsky wrote: > To phrase it like that, yes. You could to this now: > > [4,5].should include(obj.size) Nice > HTH, > David Thanks Aidy ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailm

[rspec-users] Google App Engine

2010-04-28 Thread Jeff Huter
Can someone provide instructions for setting up rspec with Rails on Google App Engine? ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3, Rspec 2 - flash notice

2010-04-28 Thread David Chelimsky
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Andrei Erdoss wrote: > The flash notice test is not working in 2.0.0.beta.8. I tried it with > redirect_to messages_path, :notice => "message" or redirect_to messages_path, > :flash => {:notice => "message" } Please add an issue for this: http://github.com/rspec/rs

Re: [rspec-users] .size.should === (4..5)

2010-04-28 Thread David Chelimsky
On Apr 28, 2010, at 12:53 PM, aidy lewis wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to test whether an array size is either of two integer > obejects > > mark_up_parser.sorted_xml.size.should === (4..5) > > However I am recieiving an exception of: > > expected: 4..5, >

[rspec-users] .size.should === (4..5)

2010-04-28 Thread aidy lewis
Hi, I would like to test whether an array size is either of two integer obejects mark_up_parser.sorted_xml.size.should === (4..5) However I am recieiving an exception of: expected: 4..5, got: 4 (using ===) Do I need to write a custom mat

Re: [rspec-users] File creation

2010-04-28 Thread ben rooney
Rick Many thanks - I think the idea of breaking out the actual file writing from the code generation is a great one. I don't need to test File I/O - I think I can assume that that works just fine... Many thanks for your help Ben ___ rspec-users mailing

Re: [rspec-users] testing against a live environment

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Van Horn
I've been using rspec with webrat, for exactly this sort of thing, as detailed here: http://blog.veez.us/2009/09/11/integration-testing-without-cucumber On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Martin DeMello wrote: I have a series of tests I want to automate, which involve running shell scripts in a "l

Re: [rspec-users] Rails 3, Rspec 2 - flash notice

2010-04-28 Thread Andrei Erdoss
The flash notice test is not working in 2.0.0.beta.8. I tried it with redirect_to messages_path, :notice => "message" or redirect_to messages_path, :flash => {:notice => "message" } On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:08 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Andrei Erdoss wrote: > > I a