just a note not the greatest of code but just an
attempt
On 18/02/2010 21:17, Stephen Smithstone wrote:
I to am starting to learn Rspec so i had an
attempt
at your problem and i came up with this solution
http://github.com/ssmithstone/learning_rspec
I will expand on this code if
I to am starting to learn Rspec so i had an attempt
at your problem and i came up with this solution
http://github.com/ssmithstone/learning_rspec
I will expand on this code if you want the render nothing if called
with ajax was a puzzler for me as not come across that before as
learning rails
On 18 Feb 2010, at 19:33, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Hello guys,
I was spec'ing a model and just tried to do something like this
it "should create a payment with period_start & period_end set
correctly" do
it "should create a new payment for an approved transaction"
On 18 Feb 2010, at 19:33, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
Hello guys,
I was spec'ing a model and just tried to do something like this
it "should create a payment with period_start & period_end set
correctly" do
it "should create a new payment for an approved transaction"
Hello guys,
I was spec'ing a model and just tried to do something like this
it "should create a payment with period_start & period_end set
correctly" do
it "should create a new payment for an approved transaction"
previous_payment = Payment.find(Payment.last.id-1)
jus
Why don't you open the class, and set the constant like so:
class TheClass
CONSTANT = 'value_it_should_have_for_the_current_spec'
end
This worked for me.
Marcelo.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nick Hoffman wrote:
> On 2008-10-16, at 15:12, Craig Demyanovich wrote:
>
>> Cool. Having seen
Yeah, I have the book.. have read it.. also have watched peepcode's
three screencasts on rspec, also have watched the first 7 episodes of
BDDCasts.
I just am still fuzzy on lots of things, and am hoping someone will be
kind enough to go through my spec file and show me what kind of code
they would
Thanks for the advice,
Webrat's have_select or does work with any object that responds to
:body. so I've now got it working with Steven Parkes's Env.js port to
Johnson w/TraceMonkey.
RSpec on Javascript w/o a browser. Sweet.
Cheers,
Ed
Ed Howland
http://greenprogrammer.wordpress.com
http://twit
Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote:
those who knows more say the idea is to keep in the example only what
is important for the example (but they surely say it even better than
me) which is what you are doing +1,
greetings,
joaquin
2010/2/18 Matt Wynne mailto:m...@mattwynne.net>>
On 18 Feb 201
those who knows more say the idea is to keep in the example only what is
important for the example (but they surely say it even better than me) which
is what you are doing +1,
greetings,
joaquin
2010/2/18 Matt Wynne
>
> On 18 Feb 2010, at 16:25, m...@franklakatos.com wrote:
>
> I know we are s
On 18 Feb 2010, at 16:25, m...@franklakatos.com wrote:
I know we are suppose to keep specs obvious and readable, but is it
normal (or there any opposition) to stubbing every method call that
you needed in a before block and simply over-riding the same method
with a should_receive in the ac
I know we are suppose to keep specs obvious and readable, but is it
normal (or there any opposition) to stubbing every method call that
you needed in a before block and simply over-riding the same method
with a should_receive in the actual tested it()?
Example
describe "#create" do
it "s
patrick99e99 wrote:
Hi,
So-- I am very very new to BDD.. and I am trying to go over and write
The best place to start is the RSpec Book.
http://www.pragprog.com/titles/achbd/the-rspec-book
Peace,
Phillip
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-us
Hi,
So-- I am very very new to BDD.. and I am trying to go over and write
some tests for existing code that has been problematic... I am
struggling with knowing exactly how to write the proper specs. So I
wrote out a list of things this controller action should do, but as
far as how to really ho
14 matches
Mail list logo
