On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Amit Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >
> >> >>
> >> It gets executed but i am not able to see any results as in 2 examples 2
> >> passed something like that as it comes normally.
> >>
> >
>
David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Amit Kulkarni
> wrote:
>
>> >>
>> It gets executed but i am not able to see any results as in 2 examples 2
>> passed something like that as it comes normally.
>>
>
> Then how do you know it gets executed?
I dont know,When i run the comm
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
>>
>> You want to use "spec" to run files directly. If you have your heart
>> set on running files from "ruby" then you'll need to load
>> "spec/autorun" to actually execute the specs.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>it "should map { :controller => 'home' } RESTfully" do
> >> params_from( :get, '/home' ).should == { :controller => 'home',
> >> :action => '
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:34 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
> perhaps this has been discussed before and you can point me to the
> right thread, but is it possible to run specs from the command line
> using just ruby?
> ruby arguments_spec.rb
>
> and it "just run" (like test/unit seems to)?
What happens w
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
>
> You want to use "spec" to run files directly. If you have your heart
> set on running files from "ruby" then you'll need to load
> "spec/autorun" to actually execute the specs.
After giving the original querent a hard time, it surprises me t
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:14 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
>
>> I really like what Aslak and the Cucumber community have done by
>> making cukes.info more high level and building up more extensive
>> documentation on the github wiki, so I'd rather put energy into
>> beefing up the github wiki than improve
> I really like what Aslak and the Cucumber community have done by
> making cukes.info more high level and building up more extensive
> documentation on the github wiki, so I'd rather put energy into
> beefing up the github wiki than improve rspec.info. What do you think?
Using a wiki sound
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:34 PM, rogerdpack wrote:
> perhaps this has been discussed before and you can point me to the
> right thread, but is it possible to run specs from the command line
> using just ruby?
> ruby arguments_spec.rb
>
> and it "just run" (like test/unit seems to)?
>
> I can't thi
> > expected: "`four, five` are not recognized argument keywords",
> > got: "`five, four` are not recognized argument keywords" (using
> > ==)
> > ./spec\arguments_spec.rb:140:
>
> Please be sure to post the relevant code when you are asking for help on
> this list. I'll take a guess at what is
perhaps this has been discussed before and you can point me to the
right thread, but is it possible to run specs from the command line
using just ruby?
ruby arguments_spec.rb
and it "just run" (like test/unit seems to)?
I can't think of a great reason why this would be useful, other than
not havi
Thanks Paul,
As soon as I read the first part of your message I had one of those
face-palm moments. Thanks for your help. In the case of this
expectation, I'm not sure which path I'll take as this particular test
is looking for it to read a certain number of lines of input before
finding the tar
12 matches
Mail list logo
