Re: [rspec-users] timeouts with ruby 1.9.1

Sorry, actually those were not the full backtraces. Please see below: Example 1 User validation should require a name' FAILED expected "is required." got nil (compared using eql?) /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/lib/spec/expectations/fail_with.rb:41:in

[rspec-users] timeouts with ruby 1.9.1

I find myself in a confused spot. Please note I am running OS X 10.5 ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-darwin9] rspec 1.2.9 rspec-rails 1.2.9 TextMate Version 1.5.8 (1509) I have a user model and a corresponding user_spec.rb.file. When I run user_spec.rb in TextMate all examples pas

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec-rails 1.2.9 Released

Oh, I see it. Thanks; scanned right past it... On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Chris Flipse wrote: > > rubyforge seems to have picked up the rspec release, but not the > rspec-rails > > release -- the web interface (at least) still says t

Re: [rspec-users] Can't run specs after upgrading gems... get 0 tests, 0 assertions...

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Stephen Eley wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Paco Guzman wrote: >> >> If I change to :lib => false I got the same text in the execution. But >> If I uninstall test-unit 2.0.3 like Len said the examples executes >> right. > > There's a pernicious known bug

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec-rails 1.2.9 Released

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Chris Flipse wrote: > rubyforge seems to have picked up the rspec release, but not the rspec-rails > release -- the web interface (at least) still says that the most recent > rspec-rails is 1.2.7.1 It's actually in the rspec package (with the rspec gem) on http://r

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec-rails 1.2.9 Released

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Chris Flipse wrote: > rubyforge seems to have picked up the rspec release, but not the rspec-rails > release -- the web interface (at least) still says that the most recent > rspec-rails is 1.2.7.1 The gems repository is right, though. Running "gem outdated" tells

Re: [rspec-users] [ANN] rspec-rails 1.2.9 Released

rubyforge seems to have picked up the rspec release, but not the rspec-rails release -- the web interface (at least) still says that the most recent rspec-rails is 1.2.7.1 On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:08 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > rspec-rails version 1.2.9 has been released! > > *