David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
Please have a look at
http://gist.github.com/131277
What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I can parametize
a method. So my shared example would perhaps use method named_address=, or
set_named_
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Stephen Eley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>>
>> If you do go down that route, I recommend method calls instead of instance
>> variables. That way it will yell out you when you forget to define one. :)
>
> Hey, instance variables do th
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
>
> If you do go down that route, I recommend method calls instead of instance
> variables. That way it will yell out you when you forget to define one. :)
Hey, instance variables do that too. Yelling == "my tests fail." >8->
(And if they don'
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 17 Jun 2009, at 16:21, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Premdas
wrote:
Please have a look at
http://gist.github.com/131277
What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:54 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Okay, after such a harsh analysis of the problem, I figured it was worth
> digging in just a little bit more. Side note, some of what I was seeing
> yesterday was a by-product of having default routes still existing. But
> there are still some ess
Okay, after such a harsh analysis of the problem, I figured it was worth
digging in just a little bit more. Side note, some of what I was seeing
yesterday was a by-product of having default routes still existing. But there
are still some essential facts that remain, which I present here.
1.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I can parametize
> a method. So my shared example would perhaps use method named_address=, or
> set_named_address and then groups that behave like "Named address" would be
> able to
ok, I investigated further...and I'm still confused.
this is testing a typical authenticate class method..
# login can be either username or email address
def self.authenticate(login, pass)
user = find_by_username(login) || find_by_email(login)
return user if user && user.matching
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 17 Jun 2009, at 16:21, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Premdas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please have a look at
>>> http://gist.github.com/131277
>>> What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I c
On 17 Jun 2009, at 16:21, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Premdas
wrote:
Please have a look at
http://gist.github.com/131277
What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I can
parametize
a method. So my shared example would perhaps use method
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Please have a look at
> http://gist.github.com/131277
> What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I can parametize
> a method. So my shared example would perhaps use method named_address=, or
> set_named_address and then gr
Please have a look at
http://gist.github.com/131277
What I'd like to do is create a shared_examples group which I can parametize
a method. So my shared example would perhaps use method named_address=, or
set_named_address and then groups that behave like "Named address" would be
able to override
12 matches
Mail list logo
