Actually, I do have my own object wrapping GeoIp, and I stubbed the
method on that object that returns a country code for me.
I can see maybe creating another object to be used in the test
environment, but I can't see what advantages that offers over using
the rspec mocking framework.
On Ma
Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere, Google was not very helpful
to me on this one. If I'm running a model spec and am one of those
benighted souls who wants to hit the DB while doing so, is there a way
for me to tell RSpec to skip transactions? In Test::Unit I can say
"uses_transaction :test
Hi again. I haven't heard any responses on this thread (is this thing
on? ;).
Is there any known pattern for verifying a route that *doesn't* exist,
as of Rspec 1.2.6?
Thanks,
Randy
Randy Harmon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When upgrading to rspec/rspec-rails 1.2.6 gem (from 1.1.12), I'm having
> a new pr
Hi again. I haven't heard any responses on this thread (is this thing
on? ;) .
Is there any known pattern for verifying a route that *doesn't* exist,
as of Rspec 1.2.6?
Thanks,
Randy
Randy Harmon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When upgrading to rspec/rspec-rails 1.2.6 gem (from 1.1.12), I'm having
> a new
My absolute favorite solution for this:
http://github.com/chrisk/fakeweb/tree/master
I use that in an application I'm building that uses Twitter's OAuth,
and otherwise heavily uses the Twitter API. It allows me to easily
fake out all of Twitter's responses so I can do
unit/integration/acceptance t
Don't mock the Geolp library directly. Wrap it with an API that fits
your domain better. Then write a very simple object that implements
the same API but doesn't hit the network. You can use a switch
somewhere in env.rb to use your fake implementation or the Geolp one.
Pat
On Sunday, May 3, 2009,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:57 PM, BJ Clark wrote:
>> Fernando,
>>
>> They are easier to spec with Pat Maddox's "no peeping toms" plugin.
>> http://github.com/pat-maddox/no-peeping-toms/tree/master
>
> I use Pat's no-peeping-toms plugin as well.
> Hi List,
> We didn't resolve this in the end, we rolled back to Cucumber 0.3.0; has
> anyone else seen anything similar?
>
Nobody else has reported anything similar on this mailing list.
Can you run with --backtrace on so we can see where the error is coming
from?
Can you also gist your features
Hi List,
We didn't resolve this in the end, we rolled back to Cucumber 0.3.0; has
anyone else seen anything similar?
- Lee
2009/4/30 Julian Leviston
> I have NO idea if this is relevant, but the way you extend worlds has
> changed, I'm fairly sure.
> Julian.
>
>
> On 30/04/2009, at 10:15 PM, Le
