I have a set of users
And a set of things ... podcasts
Users should get a page that shows all of the podcassts with a check box
If they are subscribed then the check box is checked
Users table has first_name, last_name, user_name
Podcats table has podcast_name, description, url
Subscriptions t
> Aslak,
>
Any chance you could join #cucumber on IRC tonight?
Aslak
>
> I just ran the simple examples in your latest version of cucumber_java, and
> it exposes the ambiguous steps problem that I'm seeing.
> Before I could get it to run, I had to make four changes to the
> cucumber-maven proje
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Schuerig
>> wrote:
>>> > On Sunday 19 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Michael Schuerig
> wrote:
> [big snip]
>
>> I think I am starting to understand what you're after. You want to
>> ensure the scope defined in your query_scope
Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:08 AM, John Goodsen
> wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll reproduce in a simple example and create a ticket...
>>
>>
> Excellent - I'll get to it ASAP
I never got a ticket from any of you, but I have committed a fix:
http://gith
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009, Pat Maddox wrote:
>> In a functional test, create some records that will be in the scope
>> and some that will be out of the scope, hit the page and make sure
>> you only see the ones that you want. I would either
2009/4/20 Barun Singh
> found the answer via some more searching; it appears this is a bug with
> webrat that hasn't been fixed yet; if i add
> "selenium.wait_for_page_to_load(5)"
> after the click_button command, things work fine.
>
I hit a similar problem and ended up putting the following in
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:45 PM, John Goodsen wrote:
> Aslak,
>
> I just ran the simple examples in your latest version of cucumber_java, and
> it still exposes the ambiguous steps problem that I'm seeing. Before I
> could get it to run, I had to make some changes to the cucumber-maven
> project
On Monday 20 April 2009, Pat Maddox wrote:
> In a functional test, create some records that will be in the scope
> and some that will be out of the scope, hit the page and make sure
> you only see the ones that you want. I would either do this with
> cucumber, or write a controller spec and verify
Aslak,
I just ran the simple examples in your latest version of cucumber_java, and
it still exposes the ambiguous steps problem that I'm seeing. Before I
could get it to run, I had to make some changes to the cucumber-maven
project:
The class CucumberMojo has Java 6'isms in it and the client I'
In a functional test, create some records that will be in the scope
and some that will be out of the scope, hit the page and make sure you
only see the ones that you want. I would either do this with
cucumber, or write a controller spec and verify that only certain
records show in the the assigns
I wrote a blog post that may be helpful.
http://www.patmaddox.com/blog/demeter-is-for-encapsulation Basically,
when you have structural objects as in this case, demeter isn't
useful.
Luke Redpath wrote something called Demeter's Revenge which you might
want to look at. I've not used it though so
On Monday 20 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Michael Schuerig
wrote:
[big snip]
> I think I am starting to understand what you're after. You want to
> ensure the scope defined in your query_scope configuration block in
> the controller is used to set the scope o
found the answer via some more searching; it appears this is a bug with
webrat that hasn't been fixed yet; if i add
"selenium.wait_for_page_to_load(5)"
after the click_button command, things work fine.
i've opened up a new ticket in the webrat lighthouse acct.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Ba
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Martin wrote:
> Hi Aslkak,
>
I have been called many things, but never that.
>
>
> Did you change your test.rb to use
>> config.cache_classes = false
>> ?
>>
>
> you're right, I changed it because of rspec-server. Now I found the hint on
>
> http://wiki.github
I'm trying to use Cucumber with Selenium to test my app. I have a method
called "login_as" defined as follows:
def login_as(user, password)
visit new_session_path
fill_in "username", :with => user.username
fill_in "password", :with => password
click_button('Go')
response.bo
Hi Aslkak,
Did you change your test.rb to use
config.cache_classes = false
?
you're right, I changed it because of rspec-server. Now I found the hint
on
http://wiki.github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/spec_server-autospec-nearly-pure-bdd-joy
that it breaks cucumber...
Thanks,
Martin
_
Aslak,
I just ran the simple examples in your latest version of cucumber_java, and
it exposes the ambiguous steps problem that I'm seeing.
Before I could get it to run, I had to make four changes to the
cucumber-maven project. The class CucumberMojo has Java 6'isms in
it and the client I'm workin
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> On Sunday 19 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Schuerig
> wrote:
>> > On Sunday 19 April 2009, Zach Dennis wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Michael Schuerig
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> >
Julian Leviston wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a bunch of tests written in cucumber, and they're all
lovely... this is rails testing i'm doing by the way and now I'm
coming to testing the javascript and AJAX parts of the app... and I've
decided to plug in selenium... my issue is, I'd like to sele
Hi All,
I've got a bunch of tests written in cucumber, and they're all
lovely... this is rails testing i'm doing by the way and now I'm
coming to testing the javascript and AJAX parts of the app... and I've
decided to plug in selenium... my issue is, I'd like to select which
adapter to
On 20 Apr 2009, at 02:57, Michael Schuerig wrote:
I'd rather check that a particular scope is in effect for a call to
#find. Just as I said. ;-)
As is always the case with spec'ing Rails, I don't know which level of
abstraction is the right one to check, but it seems like what you're
asking
22 matches
Mail list logo
