On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Brandon Olivares
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use route_for to test my routes. I have two routes that have
> the same path, but different request methods.
>
> map.with_options :controller => 'contact' do |c|
> c.contact 'contact.html', :action => 'index',
> :co
Gavin Hughes wrote:
"Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
nested route?
Hi Gavin,
Let me try to answer your question without actually answering it. :)
I generally don't test my URLs. IMO, for the majorit
Ben, Josh
Makes perfect sense. The user won't be looking at the URL. He'll
expect some result on the page, thus we test for that.
Thanks!
Gavin
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://
Hi,
I'm trying to use route_for to test my routes. I have two routes that have
the same path, but different request methods.
map.with_options :controller => 'contact' do |c|
c.contact 'contact.html', :action => 'index',
:conditions => {:method => :get}
c.process_contact_form 'contact.html',
I'm not sure, cause I've never tried to write a step like that.
I would rather do
Then I should see "Editing 'My sweet comment'"
Even better would be to actually edit the comment and make sure that
it changed. So maybe
When I edit the comment to be "My new comment"
Then I should see "My new com
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Gavin Hughes wrote:
> The problem is actually this:
>
> And I fill in ...
> And I press "Create Comment"
> Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
> /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
>
> How do you write a step for that?
Personally I try and stay away from step
Gavin Hughes wrote:
The problem is actually this:
And I fill in ...
And I press "Create Comment"
Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
/users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
How do you write a step for that?
I just saw this second message.. My assumption about what you were
testing was of
Hi,
Lately I've found myself trying to reduce typing as much as possible, so
when I have a lot of tests that only differ in a few variables, I tend to
abstract them to reduce typing.
For instance, I have an assert_form_errors method that I call within a
describe block to ensure the proper errors
The problem is actually this:
And I fill in ...
And I press "Create Comment"
Then I should be on [the correct page, ie.
/users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit]
How do you write a step for that?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users maili
"Then I should be on /users/3/posts/8/comments/2/edit"
What's the solution for parsing out and matching and arbitrarily deep
nested route?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.
Hi Folks,
This is an idea I've been playing with for some time, and I think I've
finally it into a shape where it might be useful to other people.
Cucover is a thin wrapper for Cucumber which makes it lazy.
What does it mean for Cucumber to be lazy? It will only run a feature
if it needs t
Hi,
I have just started to use Cucumber.
I'm struggling to use Cucumber on the feature that is available only to
the logged in user.
Could anybody provide the codes that need to be added?
The sites I found by Google search don't give clear information about
what to do.
The ones I found are:
ht
Hi,
I have just started to use Cucumber.
I'm struggling to use Cucumber on the feature that is available only to
the logged in user.
Could anybody provide the codes that need to be added?
The sites I found by Google search don't give clear information about
what to do.
The ones I found are:
ht
On Apr 7, 2009, at 5:19 PM, aslak hellesoy wrote:
The core Cucumber team now consists of Joseph Wilk, Ben Mabey and
myself. Welcome Ben!
Great choice, great team. Thanks for all your hard work, gentlemen.
--
Luke Melia
l...@lukemelia.com
http://www.lukemelia.com/
___
On 9 Apr 2009, at 20:36, Zach Dennis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Zach Dennis
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Matt Wynne
wrote:
On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:47, Zach Dennis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Williams, Wesley
wrote:
Matt,
Hmm, I think this is one way to
I understand how this happens when I *really do* have ambiguous steps, but
in my simple case, I don't. I only have a single class which contains steps
(attached below). I can run a single scenario just fin, but when I try to
run multiple scenarios in one run, I get Ambiguous step errors. It's li
On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:47, Zach Dennis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Williams, Wesley
wrote:
Matt,
Hmm, I think this is one way to do it. I will need to get my
customer
to think differently about defining the requirements. They really
like
the tables.
Some times table just wo
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>>
>> On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:47, Zach Dennis wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Williams, Wesley
>>> wrote:
Matt,
Hmm, I think this is one way to do it. I will nee
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:55 PM, James Byrne wrote:
> This is a question of technique. To what degree do projects generally
> test page/report layouts? Do you just check to see if the expected data
> is present or do you also check that the layout is presentable?
We use humans to check layout an
i am trying to learn testing for rails apps.
i followed the two authlogic tutorials (basic authlogic setup and
password reset) and now i am trying to add some integration tests with
cucumber (i know you are supposed to do the tests 1st, but i am just
trying to figure out how things work).
i found
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 9 Apr 2009, at 17:47, Zach Dennis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Williams, Wesley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> Hmm, I think this is one way to do it. I will need to get my customer
>>> to think differently about defining th
This is a question of technique. To what degree do projects generally
test page/report layouts? Do you just check to see if the expected data
is present or do you also check that the layout is presentable?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
John Goodsen wrote:
>
> but when I run my tests with: jruby -S cucumber -r
> stories/support/env.rb
>
> I am getting Ambiguous match of my steps - but I only have a single
> class of steps, NavigationSteps.
>
> any ideas what's going on?
You have two (or more) step matchers that match a sin
Hi all,
I'm not quite sure I understand how env.rb is loaded in the cucumber/jruby
world. I have
a directory structure like this:
stories/fulfillment_status_tracking
stories/fulfillment_status_tracking/main_success.feature
stories/fulfillment_status_tracking/test.feature
stories/regular_billme_s
Pat Maddox wrote:
>
>
> I just did a github search and the only place I found method_exists?
> referenced was in mocha. So my guess is that in test mode, mocha is
> being loaded and so it's passing for you. Try using respond_to?
> instead of method_exists? I've never even heard of method_exists
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Joseph Wilk wrote:
>
> James Byrne wrote:
>>
>> James Byrne wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
>>> causing it.
>>>
>>> Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
>>> in development:
>>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:46 AM, James Byrne wrote:
>> This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
>> causing it.
>>
>> Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
>> in development:
>>
>> un
James Byrne wrote:
James Byrne wrote:
This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
causing it.
Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
in development:
undefined method `method_exists?' for #
I put in a print self.methods.sort
James Byrne wrote:
> This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
> causing it.
>
> Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
> in development:
>
> undefined method `method_exists?' for #
I put in a print self.methods.sort.to_yaml and, sure
Didn't spot this when you replied earlier -- cheers for that!
Doug.
2009/4/8 Zach Dennis
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:08 PM, doug livesey wrote:
> > Hi, after an update to all the latest gems, I have a controller spec
> failing
> > that wasn't previously:
> >flash[:alert].should eql( "Blah
Three Cucumberists! You're just an onion short of a salad!
Best regards, and congratulations Ben!
Tim
On Apr 8, 2009 3:14 AM, "Matt Wynne" wrote:
On 7 Apr 2009, at 22:19, aslak hellesoy wrote: > Ben Mabey has accepted my
invitation to be on the...
Nice one Ben :)
Matt Wynne
http://blog.mattwy
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:46 AM, James Byrne wrote:
> This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
> causing it.
>
> Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
> in development:
>
> undefined method `method_exists?' for #
>
> /usr/lib64/ruby/ge
Fedor Fomenko wrote:
Hello,
I have the following step for checking that a validation message is
displayed on screen:
Then /^(.+) should be displayed$/ do |error|
msg = @browser.ul(:class, 'validation-summary-errors').li(:text,
error)
#pp msg.text
msg.should_not == nil
end
I run scenario
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Williams, Wesley
wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Hmm, I think this is one way to do it. I will need to get my customer
> to think differently about defining the requirements. They really like
> the tables.
Some times table just work best. I love writing scenarios with natural
This has just cropped up this morning and I have no clue as to what is
causing it.
Here is the error when running the application through the web browser
in development:
undefined method `method_exists?' for #
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.2/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.
The stub for params was the reason, that put :update has called the index
action.
Now I pass the params directly in and it works fine:
put :update, :pl_planning => {"title" => "Project 1"}
Scott, thanks a lot for the tip !!!
Andrea
*Von:* "Andrea Jahn"
*Gesendet:* 09.04.09 16:03:53
*A
Hi,
I tried to stub the params method of the Controller because
I got the error " You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!"
for the access to params[:pl_planning]["item_model_version_id"]
in the update action.
I thought, that the stubbing is not working because of the following error:
Matt,
Hmm, I think this is one way to do it. I will need to get my customer
to think differently about defining the requirements. They really like
the tables.
Thanks,
Wes
-Original Message-
From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of
I have similar concerns. I am coming from a background in Fit/FitNesse
so I am use to the table idea but I am not completely convinced it is
better. I really appreciate all the feedback I am getting though, great
community. I bought 'The Rspec Book' which is what got me started
looking at the to
Matt,
I am open to referring to separate documentation/scenario. It would be nice if
I can optionally make it appear in the tests but that is a nice to have. Is
this just an example/idea or is it possible to do this currently?
Thanks,
Wes
From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org
[m
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
>
> Another way to remove duplication (and noise) from Cucumber steps is the
> hide the details in the Ruby code that implements the step, and write a much
> more general step in the feature file like this:
>
>Given there are 3 flights de
Two other brainstorms:
Brainstorm 1:
Given an empty flights database
And aircraft XX1 flight number XX0001 departs on 03Mar2009 at 1000
And aircraft XX1 flight number XX0002 departs on 03Mar2009 at 1400
And aircraft XX1 flight number XX0003 departs on 03Mar2009 at 2100
Hello,
I have the following step for checking that a validation message is
displayed on screen:
Then /^(.+) should be displayed$/ do |error|
msg = @browser.ul(:class, 'validation-summary-errors').li(:text,
error)
#pp msg.text
msg.should_not == nil
end
I run scenario with examples table whi
Beware of scaffolds - they stop you from thinking which is never good.
Anyway my guess at the answer is inline.
On 8 Apr 2009, at 22:18, TimBooher wrote:
any takers? am i asking a question that is too hard or too easy and
boring?
thanks,
tim
On Apr 7, 7:41 am, Tim Booher wrote:
I am trying
On 8 Apr 2009, at 10:31, Williams, Wesley wrote:
All,
I know this is an older post but I have a similar but different set
of scenarios I need to handle. I have a set of flight related
scheduling features, such as delay, reschedule, and cancel, each
with multiple scenarios that have an ef
> No, please don't get used to it. The behaviour you expect is correct,
> and the behaviour you are seeing is incorrect.
Okidoke, I've submitted a ticket on Lighthouse.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/
46 matches
Mail list logo
