I'm trying to set a specific host that all my Cucumber steps should
use. Putting 'host! "beta.rupture.local"' in Before in env.rb doesn't
produce any errors, but it doesn't seem to be making the next request
use that host, either.
If I explicitly create a step whose definition includes 'host!
"bet
Zach Dennis wrote:
> +1 to composition over inheritance here. Mocking at different layers
> of an inheritance hierarchy sounds like trouble and screams to pull
> that thing apart.
Good point! I've already tried the composition approach. It solves the
testabilitiy problems, but it doesn't feel rig
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Tobi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need to write some wrapper classes, that derive from SWIG generated
> proxy classes for some C/C++ extensions.
>
> The Ruby wrapper classes need to do a lot of 'super' calls to the base
> classes generated by SWIG.
>
> The question is: Is th
Bart Zonneveld wrote:
...and found this as 4th result:
http://www.cafepress.com/foodparadise/4708787
I have a husband named Dean Wormer at Faber. Still want to show me your
cucumber?
--
Marion Wormer
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@
...and found this as 4th result:
http://www.cafepress.com/foodparadise/4708787
cheers,
bartz
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Hello alltogether,
thanks for your help. A mixture of stub_model and .errors.stub!() helped
me to solve my problem.
I also stumbled across the right arguments of have_tag. I thought it's
similar to assert_select as the docs said. But it isn't. I found
http://rubypond.com/articles/2008/03/31
Hi!
I need to write some wrapper classes, that derive from SWIG generated
proxy classes for some C/C++ extensions.
The Ruby wrapper classes need to do a lot of 'super' calls to the base
classes generated by SWIG.
The question is: Is there any way to make RSpec mock a base class and
record/verify
