Re: [rspec-users] [Cucumber, Merb, Webrat] undefined method 'response' for

2009-01-31 Thread Jim Morris
Justin Smestad wrote: > Daniel, I have fixed this in my fork: > http://github.com/jsmestad/merb_cucumber/tree/master > I still get the same error after installing jsmestad-merb_cucumber-0.5.1.3 from gems.github.com Did the version get bumped OK? or do I need to clone and build locally? Thanks -

Re: [rspec-users] resource urls only work *after* a get() in controller spec

2009-01-31 Thread Ben Mabey
r_j_h_box...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm encountering an interesting symptom during example execution. I'm making a shared example group that dries up belongs-to-me before_filter testing, and it makes a callback to the example group that says it_should_behave_like that. The callback tells the shared e

[rspec-users] resource urls only work *after* a get() in controller spec

2009-01-31 Thread r_j_h_box-sf
I'm encountering an interesting symptom during example execution. I'm making a shared example group that dries up belongs-to-me before_filter testing, and it makes a callback to the example group that says it_should_behave_like that. The callback tells the shared example where to expect a redire

Re: [rspec-users] simple == with prettier error messages + good documentation

2009-01-31 Thread r_j_h_box-sf
Passing the it() and describe() args through to the reporting layer sounds like a great idea. I've thought more about the reporting-levels approach. The numeric as I postulated earlier is probably not the most useful thing. As a product manager, I want to be able to flexibly present the appr

Re: [rspec-users] RSpec get model attribute values by name

2009-01-31 Thread Pat Maddox
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:18 AM, James Byrne wrote: > Pat Maddox wrote: > >> I realize you didn't ask for all of that but I'm feeling a bit chatty. >> >> Pat > > The more information the better. I never really did understand exactly > what using eval() was supposed to accomplish, now I do. Chat a

Re: [rspec-users] OK... What is ... fu ?

2009-01-31 Thread Pat Maddox
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Mark Wilden wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Jonathan Linowes > wrote: >> >> And of course, when spelled out, F-U, has a whole different meaning... > > We just had a presentation by the developers of a Mongrel replacement called > Fuzed. Which, if you re

Re: [rspec-users] OK... What is ... fu ?

2009-01-31 Thread Mark Wilden
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Jonathan Linowes wrote: > And of course, when spelled out, F-U, has a whole different meaning... > We just had a presentation by the developers of a Mongrel replacement called Fuzed. ///ark ___ rspec-users mailing list

Re: [rspec-users] RSpec get model attribute values by name

2009-01-31 Thread James Byrne
Pat Maddox wrote: > I realize you didn't ask for all of that but I'm feeling a bit chatty. > > Pat The more information the better. I never really did understand exactly what using eval() was supposed to accomplish, now I do. Chat away... I do want to point out that this is what the ActiveRec

Re: [rspec-users] OK... What is ... fu ?

2009-01-31 Thread Jonathan Linowes
And of course, when spelled out, F-U, has a whole different meaning... On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:27 PM, doug livesey wrote: And of course the pinnacle of geekdom is to be known as a 'poodle', or one who is skilled in being skilled; a fu-fu. Damn', I appear to be posting drunk again ... 2009/1/3