Hi all - I'm sorry to report that we were not able to get the beta out
this month as we had hoped. We're very close, and should have a beta
for you in early January, but with holiday schedules as they are it's
just not possible to tie up the necessary loose ends before the year's
end.
That said, I
As am I! Really looking forward to it. Thanks guys for any head's up
or link to the preview/beta!
Tim
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Area Criações
wrote:
> I am also super interested in this book
> Atenciosamente,
>
> Daniel Lopes Area Criações
> Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
>
>
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
Thanks to you and Dave for your responses. I've commented on the
original
article with back links to this thread. Hope I didn't overstep by
saying "I
think there is some consensus that 'Con
A style thing, just exploring interactions between features and UI
2008/12/19 David Chelimsky
> Is this a feature request or a style thing?
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Aslak Hellesøy
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >
Was just using your code as an example, not being critical of it. Sorry if
it came out that way :). In its context it makes its point very clearly.
Andrew
2008/12/19 Aslak Hellesøy
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Wanted to put this idea for
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> Is this a feature request or a style thing?
I believe strictly style. Webrat supports within already, ie:
within "#my-css-selector" do |scope|
scope.should have_selector("child element")
end
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Aslak
Avdi Grimm wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
Thanks to you and Dave for your responses. I've commented on the original
article with back links to this thread. Hope I didn't overstep by saying "I
think there is some consensus that 'Contexts named after methods' is no
Is this a feature request or a style thing?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Aslak Hellesøy
wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Wanted to put this idea forward, see what you think of it. I'm using
>>> Aslaks
>>> lorry feature to illustra
I am also super interested in this book
Atenciosamente,
Daniel Lopes Area Criações
Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects
http://blog.areacriacoes.com.br/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
55 (31)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
> Thanks to you and Dave for your responses. I've commented on the original
> article with back links to this thread. Hope I didn't overstep by saying "I
> think there is some consensus that 'Contexts named after methods' is not a
> smell and ca
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> You can use read_attribute and write_attribute in models to do this sort
> of thing - though I'm not really clear exactly what it is you're trying
> to do.
> I don't think normalising is quite the right term here.
Ahh. Well when I was working with sendmail email addresse
Thanks for the responses. For some reason they showed up in the digest
email and yet have still not made it to the RSpec forum at
Ruby_forum.com.
I have been trying variants of these suggestions, indeed my very first
approach was:
def username
@username.hll_keycase
end
However, I am wor
On Dec 16, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
Lenny Marks wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent
Calendar
2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
what your specs say about your design.
I've gota a question.
Is the beta for the book coming soon before Christmas or
do I better think in something different from Santa Claus?
Oh. Please!!
Juanma
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rub
You can use read_attribute and write_attribute in models to do this sort of
thing - though I'm not really clear exactly what it is you're trying to do.
I don't think normalising is quite the right term here.
Anyhow I think you're saying that you have an attribute whose storage format
is different
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:50 AM, James Byrne wrote:
> I have asked about this issue on several different mailing lists and
> have had no response. If anyone here can offer some advice then I would
> be much obliged.
>
> I have a feature that essentially says:
>
> Given I have a user "myuser"
> W
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas
wrote:
Hi All,
Wanted to put this idea forward, see what you think of it. I'm
using Aslaks
lorry feature to illustrate this. See
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber_rails/tree/master/features/step_definitions/lorry_steps.rb
.
In part
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Wanted to put this idea forward, see what you think of it. I'm using Aslaks
> lorry feature to illustrate this. See
> http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber_rails/tree/master/features/step_definitions/lorry_steps.rb.
>
> In par
I have asked about this issue on several different mailing lists and
have had no response. If anyone here can offer some advice then I would
be much obliged.
I have a feature that essentially says:
Given I have a user "myuser"
When I fill in "User Name" with "MyUser"
And I press "Login"
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> then we have
>
> 1) Defined semantic tags that the designer should not touch
> 2) Not relied on any html elements that a designer might change
> 3) Created a step that works with the meaning of the UI not its presentation
>
> So what do you
The latest rspec-rails and rspec worked for me. Are you using the remarkable
gem?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> No I don't think so. I'll post something when I next try and get the tasks
> to work
>
> 2008/12/17 Ivor Paul
>
> HI Andrew
>>
>> I am getting the same prob
21 matches
Mail list logo
