On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Zach Dennis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
>> So I can confirm that I'm logged in, that the user is who I say he is, etc.
>>
>> e.g
>>
>> Then /^I should be logged in$/ do
>> controller.logged_in?.should be_true
>> end
>>
>> make
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> So I can confirm that I'm logged in, that the user is who I say he is, etc.
>
> e.g
>
> Then /^I should be logged in$/ do
> controller.logged_in?.should be_true
Or:
controller.should be_logged_in
Aslak
>
> end
>
> makes sense?
>
> 20
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> So I can confirm that I'm logged in, that the user is who I say he is, etc.
>
> e.g
>
> Then /^I should be logged in$/ do
> controller.logged_in?.should be_true
> end
>
> makes sense?
I know why you're doing it, but I just want to know *w
So I can confirm that I'm logged in, that the user is who I say he is, etc.
e.g
Then /^I should be logged in$/ do
controller.logged_in?.should be_true
end
makes sense?
2008/12/16 Zach Dennis
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Andrew Premdas
> wrote:
> > Doing this for Restful-Authenticatio
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> Doing this for Restful-Authentication I add the following in
> features/support/env.rb
>
> # Make visible for testing
> ApplicationController.send(:public, :logged_in?, :current_user,
> :authorized?)
Why do you need these available for cucu
Doing this for Restful-Authentication I add the following in
features/support/env.rb
# Make visible for testing
ApplicationController.send(:public, :logged_in?, :current_user,
:authorized?)
Hopefully something similar will work with Authlogic
Andrew
2008/12/16 James Byrne
> I am working with
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
>
> So I was running my specs with -w the other day, and noticed a lot of
>> warnings being produced. Some of these appear to be coming from RSpec
>> internals, which is an issue in its own r
On Dec 16, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
So I was running my specs with -w the other day, and noticed a lot of
warnings being produced. Some of these appear to be coming from RSpec
internals, which is an issue in its own right but not the subject of
this email. What I'm asking about rig
So I was running my specs with -w the other day, and noticed a lot of
warnings being produced. Some of these appear to be coming from RSpec
internals, which is an issue in its own right but not the subject of
this email. What I'm asking about right now is this. Given an
example of the form:
Jonathan Linowes writes:
> On Dec 16, 2008, at 6:50 AM, aidy lewis wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a step that has been defined by the user
>>
>> Given /a logged in user/ {}
>>
>> Now in that step I have my own step (not defined by the business) of
>>
>> Given "all projects have been deleted"
>>
>>
Lenny Marks wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
what your specs say about your design. It can be found here:
http://advent2008.hackruby.co
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
>>>
>>>
I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
2008, going o
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> Lenny Marks writes:
>
>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
>>
>>> I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
>>> 2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
>>> what your specs say
David Chelimsky wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
what your specs say about
Lenny Marks writes:
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
>
>> I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
>> 2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
>> what your specs say about your design. It can be found here:
>> http://advent20
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Lenny Marks wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
>
>> I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
>> 2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
>> what your specs say about your design. It can
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Avdi Grimm wrote:
I contributed an article on BDD and RSpec to the Ruby Advent Calendar
2008, going over some of the rules I've collected for interpreting
what your specs say about your design. It can be found here:
http://advent2008.hackruby.com/past/2008/12/10/
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, James Byrne wrote:
> I am working with the authlogic gem and trying to create a simple login
> test from cucumber features. The feature statement is:
>
> Given the user is not logged in
>
> The step definition for this is confounding me. In the
> application_contr
I am working with the authlogic gem and trying to create a simple login
test from cucumber features. The feature statement is:
Given the user is not logged in
The step definition for this is confounding me. In the
application_controller the authlogic tutorial recommends the following:
private
On Dec 16, 2008, at 6:50 AM, aidy lewis wrote:
Hi,
I have a step that has been defined by the user
Given /a logged in user/ {}
Now in that step I have my own step (not defined by the business) of
Given "all projects have been deleted"
The second step needs to be included in the first
Giv
aidy lewis wrote:
Hi,
I have a step that has been defined by the user
Given /a logged in user/ {}
Now in that step I have my own step (not defined by the business) of
Given "all projects have been deleted"
This sounds like something that might be better suited to a Before / After.
Befo
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I probably missed something), but why do
you and some others in this thread want users to actually edit a
feature?
That's going to wreck havoc with steps that won't match anymore,
breaking features, and therefore making the client angry.
WDYT?
bartz
> My thinking
Hi,
I have a step that has been defined by the user
Given /a logged in user/ {}
Now in that step I have my own step (not defined by the business) of
Given "all projects have been deleted"
The second step needs to be included in the first
Given /a logged in user/ do
Given("all projects have
Also, if people are into this sort of thing, I would be up for helping build
it.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Mischa Fierer wrote:
> A few other things...
>
> In the interface that I was describing, it would solve several problems to
> have something like:
>
> Given I'm a client
> When I fol
A few other things...
In the interface that I was describing, it would solve several problems to
have something like:
Given I'm a client
When I follow "new story"
And I drag in "Given I am a Pet Owner"
And I press "new action"
And I select "When I follow"
And I fill in "follows_what_link" with "B
I can maybe offer something here. *begin rambling*
My team of 4 (2 coders, 2 biz people) has recently switched to using Pivotal
Tracker, and we've been doing the following:
1) Figure out what we can do that will add value
2) Draw out the ui / changes on a whiteboard
3) Write out features & copy t
On 16-dec-2008, at 9:42, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 15 Dec 2008, at 12:53, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
On 14-dec-2008, at 19:49, mike.gaffney wrote:
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in
the background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing
things like this lately
+lots :)
Generally when we have problems with features its because we are trying to
do to much at once. So in your case date entry is being complicated by
different contexts, birth and incident. One of the tennents of BDD is to
write the simplest thing you can to make you feature pass. I think ano
On 15 Dec 2008, at 12:53, Bart Zonneveld wrote:
On 14-dec-2008, at 19:49, mike.gaffney wrote:
Why not make a web client that manipulates git based projects in
the background? I've been messing around with Grit and doing things
like this lately for http://rdocul.us a site I run and it is v
29 matches
Mail list logo
