On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Joseph Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3OxKdDxkpg
>
> Sorry, I had to share that :)
That guy can not phrase a scenario to save his life!
> --
> Joseph Wilk
> http://blog.josephwilk.net
>
On 1 Dec 2008, at 19:00, Fernando García Samblas wrote:
Paul,
thanks for sharing your examples. I was just thinking about posting
something that can be introduced nicely with your sample app.
Now in cuc_demo we've got a step definition for /^there are no
posties$/
in postie_steps.rb. This
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Joseph Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3OxKdDxkpg
>
> Sorry, I had to share that :)
Thank you! Fantastic. And for those who missed the kitten:
http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2008/11/10/post/362/
Aslak
> --
> Joseph Wilk
> http://
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3OxKdDxkpg
Sorry, I had to share that :)
--
Joseph Wilk
http://blog.josephwilk.net
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Paul,
thanks for sharing your examples. I was just thinking about posting
something that can be introduced nicely with your sample app.
Now in cuc_demo we've got a step definition for /^there are no posties$/
in postie_steps.rb. This way, if we'd need to add a "Given there are no
users" step we
Ben Mabey wrote:
> James Byrne wrote:
>>> as we had hoped. Since you are coming from a different perspective it
>>
> This looks great, thanks for adding it! The only thing I would change,
> that Aslak already mentioned, is that the word Tests should be changed
> to Features in most places.
> -
James Byrne wrote:
Ben Mabey wrote:
Sorry if that last remark came across a little snide. What I meant to
say was that the wiki is a community effort and it would be great if you
could improve it with your insight and point of view.
The wiki instructions probably do suffer from what you des
James,James,
Ok I think I get what your saying. You seem to be quite focused on the
idea of having quotes around variables in features subsequently in
matchers and connecting this with calls in steps to steps. I think
there two separate topics. Anyhow I wrote the following to try and
explain thing
Hi,
I just posted a tiny app that I put together for a presentation on
Cucumber.
http://github.com/thoughtless/cuc_demo/tree/master
This essentially mirrors the workflow that I strive towards. (The README
explains more.) I don't want to put myself out there as the standard to
immitate, but I thin
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Maurício Linhares
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec":
>
> /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
> `method_miss
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> No it isn't you can have
>
> When /determine the party (.*)/ do
>
> And call that in in other nested step using a string literal
>
> When
>When "deterimine the party foo"
> end
>
> In fact I never enclose the arguments with a string delimiter as I
> think it makes th
Hello guys,
I'm getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec":
/home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in
`method_missing': undefined method `full_description' for
#
(NoMethodError)
from
/usr/lib6
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mac OSX 10.5.5
> (Ruby 1.8.6 installed already)
> I installed Ruby 1.9.1 preview thusly:
> ==
> port install readline
> cd ruby-1.9.1-preview1
> ./configure --program-suffix=-tru
13 matches
Mail list logo
