On 20 Nov 2008, at 22:05, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Andrew Premdas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I actually prefer to keep these separate:
Given I am logged in as Fred
When I log in as Fred
+1, though these days I would probably have the When step matcher call
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2008, at 1:00 am, Alvin Schur wrote:
>
> I created some simple examples using cucumber, celerity, and rspec to
>> verify the behaviour of a web application.
>>
>> The examples include:
>>
>> * verifying java
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:30 PM, James Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not an RSpec question, but I was led to this problem by starting to use
> autotest with cucumber and so, however unjustly, I feel that RSpec has
> to shoulder some of the blame.
>
> I have a failing test in my clients_control
Hi,
same problem here. I always used "example.implementation_backtrace" in
a custom formatter to find out to which spec file a passing example
belongs to.
Is there another way to get the file path?
lg // andreas
On 20 Nov., 20:37, Scott Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 2
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Andrew Premdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also occasionally you may want to use a when as a given. Cucumber
> doesn't actually use the given|when|then|and to differentiate steps,
> just the regex that comes after them. Sometimes I feel that it makes
> sense as in
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:28, Rahoul Baruah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:18, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1300277
Not an RSpec question, but I was led to this problem by starting to use
autotest with cucumber and so, however unjustly, I feel that RSpec has
to shoulder some of the blame.
I have a failing test in my clients_controller test and I cannot figure
out what is wrong from the information provided from
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ben Fyvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11
and found
that this no longer exists:
# File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84
def
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ben Fyvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11 and found
> that this no longer exists:
>
>
>
> # File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84
>
> def implementation_backtrace
>
> eval("cal
Peter Jaros wrote:
> In RSpec, if you have failing examples which you don't actually want
> to deal with yet, you can make them pending, and Autotest will ignore
> the fact that they're not working. I don't think Test::Unit provides
> an equivalent feature, though.
>
> Peter
Yes, and no. You c
We just upgraded from rspec version 1.1.4 to rspec version 1.1.11 and found
that this no longer exists:
# File lib/spec/example/example_methods.rb, line 84
def implementation_backtrace
eval("caller", @_implementation)
end
I don't really know what this method is for and
Nick Hoffman wrote:
On 2008-11-18, at 15:49, Ben Mabey wrote:
Nick Hoffman wrote:
Before writing specs for a one-to-many relationship between two
models, I did some research and found that some people were creating
proxy mocks, and others were using Matthew Heidemann's
#stub_association! (whi
On 2008-11-19, at 12:26, Chris Flipse wrote:
I've actually taken this old gem and enhanced it a bit
module Spec::Mocks::Methods
def stub_association!(association_name, methods_to_be_stubbed ={})
mock_assn = Spec::Mocks::Mock.new(association_name.to_s)
stub_association_with(association_
On 2008-11-18, at 15:49, Ben Mabey wrote:
Nick Hoffman wrote:
Before writing specs for a one-to-many relationship between two
models, I did some research and found that some people were
creating proxy mocks, and others were using Matthew Heidemann's
#stub_association! (which essentially doe
On 2008-11-18, at 07:33, Rahoul Baruah wrote:
On 18 Nov 2008, at 05:41, Nick Hoffman wrote:
Before writing specs for a one-to-many relationship between two
models, I did some research and found that some people were
creating proxy mocks, and others were using Matthew Heidemann's
#stub_assoc
On 2008-11-18, at 01:53, Mano ah wrote:
Nick Hoffman wrote:
On 2008-11-14, at 06:29, Mano ah wrote:
image = Image.new
image.blob= params[:image][:blob]
image.save_picture
end
--
Hi Mano. It doesn't really matter whether or not your "picture" model
interacts with a database
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Byrne wrote:
>
>> It is not immediately clear to me whether this behaviour is
>> intended or not. Can someone provide the answer?
>>
>
> After reading the wiki I think what you are seeing is the expected
> behaviour.
Andrew Premdas wrote:
> And I accept Fred's invite
> scans better than
> And I push "accept" near "Fred"
That definitely is better. I guess I was trying to be too broad. My
original goal was to write a match that would work on any page with
multiple links/buttons (of the same name).
It see
http://groups.google.com/group/webrat/
Been noticing a lot of webrat specific messages coming by the rspec-users
mailing list, so I wanted people to be aware that there is also a Webrat
Google group available for webrat-related needs. Also, if you're an IRC type
and have a question or just to hang,
James Byrne wrote:
James Byrne wrote:
OS=CentOS-5.2
Ruby=1.8.6
Rails=2.2.1_RC
Gems all up to date
I have been experimenting with autotest and I have a few questions.
1. given: export AUTOFEATURES=true, if ./test exists (with tests) then
these tests are run and the features are not. Is this
Also occasionally you may want to use a when as a given. Cucumber
doesn't actually use the given|when|then|and to differentiate steps,
just the regex that comes after them. Sometimes I feel that it makes
sense as in the following examples
When I log in as Fred
Given I log in as F
James Byrne wrote:
> OS=CentOS-5.2
> Ruby=1.8.6
> Rails=2.2.1_RC
> Gems all up to date
>
> I have been experimenting with autotest and I have a few questions.
>
> 1. given: export AUTOFEATURES=true, if ./test exists (with tests) then
> these tests are run and the features are not. Is this intend
Have a read of this:
http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis/step-organisation
Basically rather than saving your steps in files named around the
feature, it's better to group them around the object(s) they work on.
On 20 Nov 2008, at 15:28, aidy lewis wrote:
Hi,
Do you think this is
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:28, Rahoul Baruah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:18, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1300277
Hi,
Do you think this is a satisfactory way to group step files related to
one feature
e.g.
publish_content_givens
publish_content_whens
publish_content_thens
?
Thanks
Aidy
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Chris Flipse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ended up patching webrat to avoid the post_via_redirect rails methods, and
> had to implement a version of follow_redirects that takes headers as an
> argument.
I've refactored the way that redirects are handled in Rails
Yes. I've actually had to patch webrat (behind a firewall, unfortunately)
to deal with this. Havn't had a chance to actually extract from the
firewall.
It's not actually Webrat's fault, at least from what I've managed to
uncover. The problem lies within the Rails integration tests; specifically
Don't know if this is related, but webrat 0.3.4 introduced a bug with
redirecting which I reported at
http://webrat.lighthouseapp.com/projects/10503/tickets/67
Wonder if your problem happens with webrat 0.2?
2008/11/20 aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:52 PM, kwe <
aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Rahoul Baruah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:18, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Ashley Moran has already created an
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:52 PM, kwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, using latest webrat and cucumber, basic_auth is working for the
> initial steps, just not for the redirect that follows a successful
> 'page' creation i.e.
>
> redirect_to(admin_page_path(@page))
>
> In a Rails sense.
>
Sorry -
Yes, using latest webrat and cucumber, basic_auth is working for the
initial steps, just not for the redirect that follows a successful
'page' creation i.e.
redirect_to(admin_page_path(@page))
In a Rails sense.
On Nov 20, 11:11 am, "aslak hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Rahoul Baruah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:18, Ashley Moran wrote:
>
>> On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
>>
>>> Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
>>> http:/
I did something similar with
Scenario: Cart shows item price and total price
Given there is a product with name foo and price £24.50
And I am on the products page
When I add product with name foo to cart
And a step matcher
When /^I add product with name (.*) to cart$/ do |name|
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20 Nov 2008, at 13:18, Ashley Moran wrote:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1300277
Only has one member yet though!
I've joined.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:20 pm, aslak hellesoy wrote:
Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1300277
Only has one member yet though!
Why don't you create a BDD group, Erik? Make sure you let the BDD
google group know anout it:
http://groups
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Erik Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like the idea of LinkedIn BDD and RSpec groups.
> Is somebody of the core team willing to create these?
>
Ashley Moran has already created an RSpec group:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1300277
Why do
I really like the idea of LinkedIn BDD and RSpec groups.
Is somebody of the core team willing to create these?
--Erik
Ashley Moran wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:27 pm, Matt Wynne wrote:
What about abstracting it a level and making it a BDD group? The
'Outside In' Club. Or something. :)
The
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:32 AM, kwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Starting out with Cucumber and webrat and seem to be hitting a problem
> with a resource protected with http basic auth.
>
> i.e.
>
> The following feature..
>
> Feature: Manage Pages
> In order to add a reference pages
> As a adm
Starting out with Cucumber and webrat and seem to be hitting a problem
with a resource protected with http basic auth.
i.e.
The following feature..
Feature: Manage Pages
In order to add a reference pages
As a administrator
I want to create a page
Scenario: Add a page
39 matches
Mail list logo
