[rspec-users] description method and test failures

Hi all, Hoping you can help. I have a project using rspec 1.1.3 and rails 2.0.2. I've run into a small problem. Said project has a method in application_helper.rb named "description". Whenever a spec test fails, I see a message like so: *snip*/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/repo

Re: [rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

Oi Helder, On May 13, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wonder why OP doesn't create two records, call #most_recent, and verify that the record returned is the one with the larger timestamp. I'm sorry about the

Re: [rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder why OP doesn't create two records, call #most_recent, and > verify that the record returned is the one with the larger timestamp. I'm sorry about the confusion here. Your idea sounds indeed better (I'll explain

Re: [rspec-users] rake spec:rcov failing

Wow, ok...I have had other trouble with REXML 3.1.7.3 being too finicky...a few weeks back I found it enforcing declaration of XML namespaces even though it doesn't seem to be actually doing anything with namespaces except refusing to parse if they weren't properly declared. So, I did suspect

Re: [rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

On 5/13/08, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 13, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote: > > > I'm not actually trying to test its behavior, > > > quick! Duck! INCOMING...! > ___ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge

Re: [rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

On 5/13/08, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/13/08, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 13, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote: > > > > > I'm not actually trying to test its behavior, > > > > > > quick! Duck! INCOMING...! > > __

Re: [rspec-users] rake spec:rcov failing

I havne't take a look yet, but a couple of points: - I was mistaken in my OP; I'm running REXML 3.1.7.3 - I saw a different post on a related topic that seemed to blame REXML I'd been meaning to go back to an earlier version of REXML and see if that fixed it since I had rcov working on this proje

[rspec-users] user stories for load testing?

Hi all, We've recently been kicking around different ideas for simulating user behaviour for the purposes of load testing our backend. We hit on the idea of having user stories do double duty for both verifying behaviour and (if selected stories were driven en-masse by a distributed network o

Re: [rspec-users] rake spec:rcov failing

Steve, Did you have any luck with this? I ran into this problem today, with Rcov 0.8.1.2.0, RSpec 1.1.3, and REXML 3.1.7.3. -Alf -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/ma

Re: [rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

On May 13, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Helder Ribeiro wrote: I'm not actually trying to test its behavior, quick! Duck! INCOMING...! ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

[rspec-users] Testing that named_scope is defined

Hi guys, I'm just beginning to use RSpec and I ran into the issue of testing a named_scope. I'm not actually trying to test its behavior, as it's not my code, but I wanted to test at least that it's defined. I tried doing this: describe Post, ".most_recent" do it "should be defined" do Post

Re: [rspec-users] Rspec 1.1.3 +ZenTest 3.9.1= rspec tests not found

Hi, I have just been having the same problem on windows using autotest and/or rspec_autotest I have successfully moved to rspec and rspec on rails 1.1.3 ZenTest 3.9.2 So if you were on windows the fix in case you still may need it is here http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/80-15