That was it, thank you! Must have been a long day, I can't believe I
didn't spot that :)
On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:15 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Glenn Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all! I've been through the RSpec Stories PeepCode and some
>> various
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Glenn Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all! I've been through the RSpec Stories PeepCode and some various
> other readings online, and now I'm trying to build a dummy application
> of the traditional style: log in, make posts, add comments.
>
> So I've run t
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26 Mar 2008, at 19:08, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
>
> > I finally got around to registering a project on RubyForge and pushing
> > a gem, so it is now available with just:
> >
> > gem install rspec_hpricot_matchers
>
>
It actually should do a redirect, but checking for response.should
be_success also fails. The request isn't actually being made. I just
can't figure out why.
Glenn
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Matt Berther wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> I do not mean to insult you, but is /session/create actually d
Hi Glen,
I do not mean to insult you, but is /session/create actually doing a
redirect? A similar rspec test works for me.
--
Matt Berther
http://www.mattberther.com
On Mar 26, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Glenn Ford wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2008, at
On 26 Mar 2008, at 19:08, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
> I finally got around to registering a project on RubyForge and pushing
> a gem, so it is now available with just:
>
> gem install rspec_hpricot_matchers
Hi Kyle
Thanks for releasing this as a gem, makes it much easier to get hold
of. The on
On Mar 26, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Chuck Remes wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Glenn Ford wrote:
>> Hi all! I've been through the RSpec Stories PeepCode and some
>> various
>> other readings online, and now I'm trying to build a dummy
>> application
>> of the traditional style: log in, make
brynary has done this work already (
http://github.com/brynary/rspec/tree/master). David was getting failures
when merging it in though. I looked into it one day, but nothing failed for
me.
David, have you had a chance to give it another look? I would love to get
this in.
Mark
On Wed, Mar 26, 20
On Mar 26, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Glenn Ford wrote:
> Hi all! I've been through the RSpec Stories PeepCode and some various
> other readings online, and now I'm trying to build a dummy application
> of the traditional style: log in, make posts, add comments.
>
> So I've run the scaffold for posts/comm
Perhaps I am missing something extremely obvious, but I am unable to
get my specs to work for an ArticlesController which is accessed using
URLs like "/wiki/foo".
Here's the corresponding line from config/routes.rb:
map.resources :wiki, :controller => 'articles'
This is Rails 2.0.2, but i
Hello,
I'm new to RSpec and I'm having some trouble testing controllers.
After a lot of testing without coming any closer to a solution, I
figured I should try describing the problem here. Any help will be
appreciated. :-)
I'm testing controllers and view separately, but something strange
seems t
Hi all! I've been through the RSpec Stories PeepCode and some various
other readings online, and now I'm trying to build a dummy application
of the traditional style: log in, make posts, add comments.
So I've run the scaffold for posts/comments and the script for
RestfulAuthentication so I
Hello everyone,
A few weeks ago, I put together a little project that provides a
have_tag() matcher look-alike that can be used outside of Rails
projects, backed by Hpricot, which I very creatively named
rspec_hpricot_matchers. It's not a drop-in replacement for
rspec_on_rails' have_tag(): no subs
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Joe Van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to optionally reduce the story runner output to just
> dots or something? Lots of stories makes it difficult to see previous
> test results.
>
Anything is possible, but you have to implement a
progress_bar_
Is it possible to optionally reduce the story runner output to just
dots or something? Lots of stories makes it difficult to see previous
test results.
Joe
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspe
I had a similar problem with rake: try
ruby script/spec
On 25/03/2008, Eric Harris-Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> RSpec 1.1.3 is failing for me out of the box. I installed both rspec
> and rspec_on_rails using svn following the instructions on the site.
> Then I used the rsp
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:23 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > #pending works when creating a step for a plain text story, but adding
> text
> > to the method call doesn't spit it out in the output. Is th
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #pending works when creating a step for a plain text story, but adding text
> to the method call doesn't spit it out in the output. Is this a bug, or are
> we doing something wrong?
Let's call it a missing feature :)
>
> T
18 matches
Mail list logo
