Hi folks,
RSpec 1.1.3 is failing for me out of the box. I installed both rspec
and rspec_on_rails using svn following the instructions on the site.
Then I used the rspec generate script, created a very simple test
example and run rspec with:
rake spec.
What I get back is:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/s
#pending works when creating a step for a plain text story, but adding text
to the method call doesn't spit it out in the output. Is this a bug, or are
we doing something wrong?
Then("blah") do
pending "waiting for implementation details"
end
-corey
--
http://www.coreyhaines.com
The Internet's
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to get a story output that includes comment text
> inside
> > the Scenario?
> >
>
> Plain text stories are parsed and tur
Hi, I've hacked together a setup to load an RSpec backtrace into jEdit (in
other words, you'll be able to click the relevant failed behaviour or error
to go straight the relevant file and line).
More info here:
http://textgoeshere.org.uk/articles/2008/03/howto-integrate-rspec-on-rails-with-jedit/
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Corey Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an easy way to get a story output that includes comment text inside
> the Scenario?
>
Plain text stories are parsed and turn into objects, then written out
again. There is no way to capture "unknown" lines for now
To do this, I've typically just add the HTTP_ACCEPT header. I can't
remember where I picked this up, but it's does specify a format in
your respond_to block:
Here's the do_request (and a sample spec) for one of my specs where
I'm checking for a generated csv file:
def do_request
@request.
Is there an easy way to get a story output that includes comment text inside
the Scenario?
For example, I have a scenario like
Scenario: User tries to log in with invalid credentials
Card: 5732
Given a visitor
And username: invalid
Then, be able to get a summary/output that includes
Hi Seth,
To get around this, are you able to test the response.headers
collection? This tests the code that you wrote, rather than the
template logic performed by rails.
response.headers['Content-Type'].should == "text/html"
Untested, of course... but it may work :)
--
Matt Berther
http://w
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Seth Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is a guideline in TDD that you should test your code and not
> > other people's code. The behaviour you're interested in testing is
> > that of ActionController::Base, not of your code.
>
> I, of course, do not w
> There is a guideline in TDD that you should test your code and not
> other people's code. The behaviour you're interested in testing is
> that of ActionController::Base, not of your code.
I, of course, do not want to test Rails. I do, however, want to
ensure that I have a block to handle the
On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:04 AM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Chuck Remes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I have a complex object that I need to construct. This complex
>> object, at runtime, takes an object in its initializer. The
>> initializer interrogates the object a
On 25/03/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We've been talking about it for a few weeks now but have been too busy
> to make it happen. Can't make a guarantee but I think it is likely
> that we can get it out by the end of next week.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
Cool, thanks David.
done : http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/tickets/350
Thanks for your great work.
On Mar 25, 1:00 pm, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, here you go :
>
> > steps_for(:work_area_executi
On Mar 25, 2008, at 7:37 AM, "Ashley Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have an idea when RSpec 1.1.4 will be released?
We've been talking about it for a few weeks now but have been too busy
to make it happen. Can't make a guarantee but I think it is likely
that we can
Hi
Does anyone have an idea when RSpec 1.1.4 will be released? It has a bug
fix I really want - just bought a USB-controller LED traffic light but RSpec
1.1.3 never fires the :red hook so I just get a green light constantly.
(Have been pulling my hair out wondering what I was doing...)
Ashley
__
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, here you go :
>
> steps_for(:work_area_execution) do
>
> Given("a company") do
> @account = Factory.create_valid_account()
> end
>
> Given("$amount questions?") do |amount|
> Question.delete_all
> ca
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Seth Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, of course, now that I have sent the previous email, I found the
> bug in my code and have fixed it. So I know I am using RSpec
> correctly with controllers and a respond_to block. Using the :format
> => 'json' attribut
Of course, here you go :
steps_for(:work_area_execution) do
Given("a company") do
@account = Factory.create_valid_account()
end
Given("$amount questions?") do |amount|
Question.delete_all
category = Factory.create_valid_category
work_area = Factory.create_valid_work_area(ca
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some problems with GivenScenario, my scenario keeps on failing
> when I use GivenScenario, like if the database or the session was not
> in the same state at the beginning of the new scenario as it was at
> the end of t
I have some problems with GivenScenario, my scenario keeps on failing
when I use GivenScenario, like if the database or the session was not
in the same state at the beginning of the new scenario as it was at
the end of the given one. If I try to group my two scenari in only one
big scenario then it
Hm, of course, now that I have sent the previous email, I found the
bug in my code and have fixed it. So I know I am using RSpec
correctly with controllers and a respond_to block. Using the :format
=> 'json' attribute in my get call was all I needed.
However, not matter what the format I choose,
21 matches
Mail list logo
