Re: [rspec-users] Story runner "macros"

2008-01-20 Thread Ben Mabey
Pat Maddox wrote: > On Jan 20, 2008 9:09 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Now I really like the idea of the parameterized stories, but the step >> away from client-speak makes me shy away from them. Is there a way to >> get the power without loosing the intelligibility? >>

Re: [rspec-users] Story runner "macros"

2008-01-20 Thread Pat Maddox
On Jan 20, 2008 9:09 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I really like the idea of the parameterized stories, but the step > away from client-speak makes me shy away from them. Is there a way to > get the power without loosing the intelligibility? If I were to redo that, it would b

[rspec-users] autotest hanging

2008-01-20 Thread Mikel Lindsaar
Heya guys & gals, I have to do some development on a Windows box, hitting a stupid problem, wondering if anyone on the list knows how to solve it. I had RSpec 1.1.1 and ZenTest 3.6.1 - this was working fine with autotest (though no colour output). I updated to rspec 1.1.2 and zentest 3.8.0 and n

[rspec-users] Story runner "macros"

2008-01-20 Thread Rick DeNatale
I've gotten quite a bit out of Pat Maddox's screencast http://evang.eli.st/blog/2007/10/8/story-runner-top-to-bottom-screencast One thing I'm not sure of is the feature where he writes things like: When "I POST to", "/articles", :post => {:title => "Title", :body => "Body") do | path, params|

Re: [rspec-users] "should_not ==" vs "should !="

2008-01-20 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Jan 20, 2008 8:01 PM, Alex Satrapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/01/2008, at 17:36 , David Chelimsky wrote: > > > When you say 5 == 3, what that is really saying is 5.==(3), which is > > how we're able to support 5.should == 3 (becomes 5.should.==(3)). > > Would it be true to say that the r

Re: [rspec-users] Spam Protection

2008-01-20 Thread Alex Satrapa
On 19/01/2008, at 05:27 , Mark Wilden wrote: > What's weird is that I've been using the same email address since > 1996, I've > turned off spam filtering by my ISP, and yet I get very, very > little spam > these days (maybe 1-2/day). I've been using the same address since 1994, and every time

Re: [rspec-users] "should_not ==" vs "should !="

2008-01-20 Thread Alex Satrapa
On 19/01/2008, at 17:36 , David Chelimsky wrote: > When you say 5 == 3, what that is really saying is 5.==(3), which is > how we're able to support 5.should == 3 (becomes 5.should.==(3)). Would it be true to say that the reason "5.should != 3" won't work is that somewhere inside Ruby the x != y

Re: [rspec-users] no method error

2008-01-20 Thread David Chelimsky
On Jan 20, 2008 7:52 PM, G-man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've set up my tests, and when I run the whole thing, I get this for my > views: > > 3) > NoMethodError in '/chapters/new.html.erb should render new form' > undefined method `process_clean_up_fixtures' for > # > c:/rails/rails_apps/trac

[rspec-users] new --pattern option

2008-01-20 Thread David Chelimsky
Hello all, Just a heads up that I made a change (in svn trunk - not yet released) that may change what files get loaded when you run the rake or spec commands. Not a big deal if you've been following convention, but for those who haven't you may need to make a minor adjustment to your rake file or