Should the stories dir be located on the project root? I was expecting to
find it located under spec/ but there isn't anything there, just the
stories dir off of /. Also there don't appear to be any rake tasks for
stories, nor generators. Should there be any?
Thanks,
Steve
___
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually a parser for this would be quite simple
>
> Dead simple. It would also allow us to do away with methods like
> Given, When and Then, which some people have objected to (because
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great rig
On 10/14/2007 8:09 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
> In general, I prefer your syntax, making it look like a plain-text
> spec instead of Ruby code. I question whether it's a big enough win
> to justify writing a parser instead of simply writing valid Ruby.
ANT-LR! ANT-LR! ANT-LR!
Jay
___
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great rig
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
> > > now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
> > now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that discusses just
> > that. It was that recent thread that prompt
On 10/14/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
> now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that discusses just
> that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a
> bit.
>
> The basic idea is that you de
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> > > story part? It seems like that is an implementation deta
I think we all know that the readability of steps isn't great right
now, and in fact there's a very recent thread that discusses just
that. It was that recent thread that prompted me to explore this a
bit.
The basic idea is that you define step matchers, which have a regex,
and then you match ste
On 10/14/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> > story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
> > story.
> >
> > Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme
On 10/14/07, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
> story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
> story.
>
> Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme", don't you just care that you have a
> user who works for a c
Does it add any value to even add things like "Joe" and "Acme" into a
story part? It seems like that is an implementation detail of your
story.
Who cares about "Joe" or "Acme", don't you just care that you have a
user who works for a company. And if that company has a particular
trait wouldn't it
On 10/12/07, Hans de Graaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 12:47 -0400, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
> > that works for you?
> > I'm basically doing the same thing but the
> >
> >render "/pages/_page_menu.html.erb", :locals => { :pages => @foo }
>
> render :partial => 'pages/page
On 10/12/07, Alvin Schur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With rspec 1.0.8 I can run Test::Unit tests and rspec tests using:
>
> rake default
>
> and all tests and specs run.
>
>
> With edge rspec the Test::Unit tests return with the message:
>
> [list of tests]
>
> Finished in 4.5e-05 seco
On 14 Oct 2007, at 08:28, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
> On 8/13/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12 Aug 2007, at 14:38, David Chelimsky wrote:
However, what I actually need to do is check each result that is
yielded by the Connector.each_result method and compare it to the
pre
On 8/13/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2007, at 14:38, David Chelimsky wrote:
> >> However, what I actually need to do is check each result that is
> >> yielded by the Connector.each_result method and compare it to the
> >> previous one. If they are sufficiently similar I need t
19 matches
Mail list logo
