Hi,
Thanks for all the effort that has gone into making RSpec available.
I'm not a professional developer and I've found the approach
articulated has helped me a lot in writing my code, and understanding
that of others.
To cut my teeth, I'm trying to write an db adapter for the og project.
I've b
On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:54 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
>> formatter/report?
>>>
>>
>> Two things on that subject came up
On 9/11/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
> > formatter/report?
> > >
> >
> > Two things on that subjec
On 9/11/07, Geoffrey Wiseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
> formatter/report?
> >
>
> Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work. It would
> be nice if:
>
> Th
On 9/9/07, Priit Tamboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html
> formatter/report?
>
Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work. It would
be nice if:
1. The report contained pending messages, when specified, e.g.:
>
If this was a brand new bundle you wouldn't have to, but since it's
changed, and the means of identifying it has changed, you have to do
it once. After that, TextMate should do the right thing.
On 9/11/07, Fischer, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I've never "selected" a bundle before. Sh
Okay, I've never "selected" a bundle before. Shouldn't the bundle
automatically parse the document to see if it matches that bundle? for
e.ghaving "spec" in the file name? What extra steps am I missing?
On 9/11/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/11/07, Fischer, Daniel <[EMAIL
On 9/11/07, Fischer, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is it just me, or is the new rspec bundle not working as intended when
> using the "run" shortcuts?
>
> shift + cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
> cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
> and option + cmd + r brin
So is it just me, or is the new rspec bundle not working as intended when
using the "run" shortcuts?
shift + cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
cmd + r doesn't work. (brings up ruby execution)
and option + cmd + r brings up a filter dialog
They do work if I select it manually throug
On 9/5/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems'
> => true
> irb(main):002:0> require 'spec'
> => true
> irb(main):003:0> include Spec::Matchers
> => Object
> irb(main):004:0> 5.should == 5
> => nil
> irb(main):005:0> 5.should be < 4
> Spec::Expectations
Just to throw one more opinion into the pot, you can mimic how rails
handles views and do:
account.spec.rb
Just a thought.
Robert
On 9/5/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ashley Moran wrote:
> > On 4 Sep 2007, at 23:36, D
there's a patch that i submitted to the textmate bundle to run the last
example, the only thing I can't figure out is what the keyboard binding
should be
under the old scheme, I liked cmd+shift+i, but w/ the new...
ctrl+shift+r? I use it more than cmd+r or cmd+shift+r these days.
On 9/10/07, Da
> > This sounds like a fantastic idea. Why don't you give it a shot?
Thanks for feedback, I'll take more active role and perhaps able to
produce some useful stuff as well :-)
>
> Yeah - I'm already handing the HTML report off to my boss. He was
> amazed at it!
>
> I agree - this sort of thing w
13 matches
Mail list logo
