Peter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In particular, looking at Rinternals.h, VECTOR_ELT etc. are defined in
>> terms of calculating direct memory offsets from an SEXPREC. Not only
>> are there no strides (necessary for column-major R t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In particular, looking at Rinternals.h, VECTOR_ELT etc. are defined in
> terms of calculating direct memory offsets from an SEXPREC. Not only
> are there no strides (necessary for column-major R to grok row-major
> Nu
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:11 PM, laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I have briefly seen that you are doing it at the rpy2.robjects
> level. That's certainly a good way to go when wanting to offer such
> capability.
>
> Regarding SexpVector accepting numpy's one-dimensional arrays, that's
> b
I took the time to do that a little earlier.
There are adaptations to the patch, and the numpy-capabilities are
confined to a module (this way, no conditional import - and you can have
more freedom to modify further your code).
It also made me realize shortcomings in the design of
rpy2.robjects-
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 10:33 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:01 AM, laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 22:25 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
[...]
>
> >> who uses rpy without numpy?
> >
> > The R-to-numpy bridge is (officially) working.
> > (The o
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:01 AM, laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 22:25 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> rpy2 is awesome.
>>
>> But I was disconcerted to discover passing a numpy array to an R
>> function just makes things blow up ("Nothing can be done for that
>> type..."
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 22:25 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> rpy2 is awesome.
>
> But I was disconcerted to discover passing a numpy array to an R
> function just makes things blow up ("Nothing can be done for that
> type...") --
Complete error messages are:
"Nothing can be done for this array
