Hi,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When building python extensions, you are generally recommended to use
> the same compiler as was used for python. On Windows with the
> official Python 2.3, this meant MSVC 6.0, but for later versions of
> Python more recent
>>> Its been a while but I have built rpy on Windows with Python 2.3 and
>>> MSCV 6.0 (the compiler used for the official Python 2.3 installation).
>>
>> So it is possible then? I use the msvc toolkit (same compiler) to
>> build my extensions so if I could do the same with rpy, I would be
>> less d
Mario Beauchamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hopefully the backward compatibility interface in rpy 2.0 will
>> eventually make upgrading from rpy1 to rpy2 simple.
>
> I will eventually make the upgrade but since rpy is bundled into my
> soft
Mario Beauchamp wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Warnes, Gregory R.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> RPy 1.0 will continue to exist, and bug fixes will be made, but feature
>> enhancements will occur in RPy2
>
> Fair enough.
>
>> I'll try to create a Windows installer for 2.
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Warnes, Gregory R.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RPy 1.0 will continue to exist, and bug fixes will be made, but feature
> enhancements will occur in RPy2
Fair enough.
> I'll try to create a Windows installer for 2.8.0 later this week.
About that, I was
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hopefully the backward compatibility interface in rpy 2.0 will
> eventually make upgrading from rpy1 to rpy2 simple.
I will eventually make the upgrade but since rpy is bundled into my
software (along with R and a bunch of o
, December 01, 2008 11:32 AM
To: RPy help,support and design discussion list
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Rpy] future of rpy 1.0
Greg,
I setup a machine to build the rpy2 windows installer so i should be
able to build an rpy installer as well pretty painlessly. What
combination of rpy version
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Rpy] future of rpy 1.0
>
> Peter wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mario Beauchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>>
Yes, we do accept Windows binary submissions.
-greg
-Original Message-
From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:30 AM
To: RPy help,support and design discussion list
Subject: Re: [Rpy] future of rpy 1.0
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mario Beauchamp
ECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rpy] future of rpy 1.0
Peter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mario Beauchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was just wondering...
Peter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mario Beauchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was just wondering... now that rpy 2.0 seems to be the new thing,
>> does that mean rpy 1.0 will die? I am not ready yet to go 2.0 and I
>> still depend on windows installers for newer versions
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:42 AM, Mario Beauchamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering... now that rpy 2.0 seems to be the new thing,
> does that mean rpy 1.0 will die? I am not ready yet to go 2.0 and I
> still depend on windows installers for newer versions of R as they
> com
Hi,
I was just wondering... now that rpy 2.0 seems to be the new thing,
does that mean rpy 1.0 will die? I am not ready yet to go 2.0 and I
still depend on windows installers for newer versions of R as they
come along but it seems that none are coming...
Thank you
--
Mario B.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
