I am the developer who wrote that code. It was a complete rewrite
using a different paradigm. I published the most recent version at
http://serpent.speak.googlepages.com/.
On Jan 4, 2008 1:37 PM, Gregory Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The stuff in sandbox was a donated code to implement t
Hi Greg,
I'll have a look at it and contact the author.
It seems that some of the things I had in mind
(and that I could not achieve, which draw me into looking at the
current code base) could be going the same direction.
I particular I was interested in avoiding the duplication of objects
(and m
The stuff in sandbox was a donated code to implement the full object
protocol for Robj objects. I've never really looked at the code, but
have hoped to finally get to it in the next couple of months.
You are welcome to contact the developer.
-G
On Jan 4, 2008, at 11:15AM , Laurent Gautier
Thanks. I currently have a bit of time for one side project
(and the path is going through R and Python).
What is exactly in /sandbox ? (complete rewrites breaking
too many things ? else ?)
All the commits are from one developper, shouldn't I get
in touch with him to know what is in there ?
Laure
Hi Laurent,
I'm glad to see your contributions. Robj, in particular, has needed
to be expanded to support all of the (appropriate) python operations
for some time. Make sure and look at the stuff in /sandbox ...
Since 2.2 was released Dec 2001, I expect that we can now drop
support for p
Hi,
I am currently going into the details of rpy
(and sending patches).
I find that a number of things are a little oldish python-wise:
a number of conditional definitions refer to a python version lower
than 2.2.
Is there interest in keeping back-compatibility that would go that far ?
Laurent
