2008/6/10 Gregory Warnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy package
> really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled againts.
It does, but because I think this is enforced by name mangling of the
C-written python
module rpymodule*
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:41:21PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
>
> Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy
> package really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled
> againts.
>
> Note, however, that RPy is designed so that one can compile against
> sev
Well, unless/until we change the implementation, I think the rpy
package really must match the exact version*s* of R it was compiled
againts.
Note, however, that RPy is designed so that one can compile against
several version of R so that a single package can support multiple R
versions
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 12:36:19PM -0400, Gregory Warnes wrote:
> Aside, since rpy _does_ check for specific R versions, would it not be
> advisable for the .deb dependencies to reflect this appropriately?
I tried that for a while but discontinued because it can lead to
upgrade blocks just becau
Aside, since rpy _does_ check for specific R versions, would it not
be advisable for the .deb dependencies to reflect this appropriately?
-G
On Jun 8, 2008, at 1:13PM , Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 8 June 2008 at 11:15, Lars Tangvald wrote:
| Laurent Gautier skrev:
| > 2008/6/7 Dirk Edde
On 8 June 2008 at 11:15, Lars Tangvald wrote:
| Laurent Gautier skrev:
| > 2008/6/7 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| >
| >> On 5 June 2008 at 11:08, Laurent Gautier wrote:
| >> | The "issue" is with the .deb packager.
| >> | That means that R-2.6.2 was not around when the package was bu
Laurent Gautier skrev:
> 2008/6/7 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On 5 June 2008 at 11:08, Laurent Gautier wrote:
>> | The "issue" is with the .deb packager.
>> | That means that R-2.6.2 was not around when the package was built (may
>> | be it was not released then).
>>
>> It's a sy
2008/6/7 Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 5 June 2008 at 11:08, Laurent Gautier wrote:
> | The "issue" is with the .deb packager.
> | That means that R-2.6.2 was not around when the package was built (may
> | be it was not released then).
>
> It's a synchronisation issue. For Debian, w
On 5 June 2008 at 11:08, Laurent Gautier wrote:
| The "issue" is with the .deb packager.
| That means that R-2.6.2 was not around when the package was built (may
| be it was not released then).
It's a synchronisation issue. For Debian, where I maintain R, RPy, ...,
I tend to rebuild RPy when a ne
The "issue" is with the .deb packager.
That means that R-2.6.2 was not around when the package was built (may
be it was not released then).
Currently rpy is building a C-level module for each version of R (and
is looking for
the matching module at run time). Greg and I started discussing on
that:
The error message:
RuntimeError: No module named _rpy2062
RPy module can not be imported. Please check if your rpy
installation supports R 2.6.2. If you have multiple R versions
installed, you may need to set RHOME before importing rpy. For
example:
>>> from rpy_opt
I'll also toss in that this is likely an Ubuntu packaging error and you
should contact the package maintainer to see about fixing it.
A quick work around, if you do the recompile use the checkinstall
option. A side benefit will be a .deb file that you can give to other
people with the same setu
Without further details on the missing module error, it is not easy to help...
could you share them ?
Thanks,
L.
2008/6/5 Lars Tangvald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on an open-source project for running various
> chemometrics-related algorithms (www.scicraft.org).
> The software
Hi,
I'm working on an open-source project for running various
chemometrics-related algorithms (www.scicraft.org).
The software has used rpy from the beginning, as many of the desired
functions are readily available in R and not in Python.
The problem we've encountered with Ubuntu 8.04 is that t
14 matches
Mail list logo
