On 2011-09-13 19:40, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
>> On 2011-09-12 21:16, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Laurent Gautier
>>> wrote:
Probably not.
R is doing a lot of things behind the hood. Sometim
On 2011-09-13 18:48, Peter Cock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking on sourceforge I can see files for rpy 1.0.3, however, while
> there is folder on sourceforge for rpy 1.0.4, it looks empty.
>
> Was rpy 1.0.4 ever released? According to the svn browser it looks
> like 1.0.3 might have been the last rele
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
> On 2011-09-12 21:16, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Laurent Gautier
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably not.
>>>
>>> R is doing a lot of things behind the hood. Sometimes it is good,
>>> sometimes
>>> it is bad.
>>>
Apologies is this gets to the list twice, I was sending from another email
address and am unsure if the first email made it.
--
Hi all,
Looking on sourceforge I can see files for rpy 1.0.3, however, while
there is folder on sourceforge for rpy 1.0.4, it looks empty.
Was rpy 1.0.4 ever released?
Hi all,
Looking on sourceforge I can see files for rpy 1.0.3, however, while
there is folder on sourceforge for rpy 1.0.4, it looks empty.
Was rpy 1.0.4 ever released? According to the svn browser it looks
like 1.0.3 might have been the last release, but some fixes since then
have been made:
http