In data giovedì 7 aprile 2011 07:23:41, Laurent ha scritto:
> rpy2-2.2.x is believed to be more convenient to use. I can only
> encourage to already use it instead of 2.1.9.
Are there any API incompatibilities with 2.1.x or is it a drop-in replacement?
--
Luca Beltrame, Ph.D. - Translational Gen
On 05/04/11 12:24, Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data martedì 5 aprile 2011 12:11:09, Moritz Beber ha scritto:
>
>> I'm almost convinced there must be a better way but I haven't found one yet.
>
> According to what I found in the documentation, it is possible in rpy 2.2 but
> not in 2.1.x. Laurent, am
On 06/04/11 09:14, Christian Marquardt wrote:
> Laurent,
>
> the problem occurs with 2.2.0-alpha4 - is that not the most recent
> version / snapshot?
That's the most recent "release". The most recent snapshot might have
further modifications.
>
> I made reference to the same problem in 2.1.9 bec
Laurent,
the problem occurs with 2.2.0-alpha4 - is that not the most recent
version / snapshot?
I made reference to the same problem in 2.1.9 because it suggests
(IMHO) that whatever the problem is, it might only indirectly be
caused by the most recent changes in rpy. So a diff might not help
tha
