[Rpy] How rpy2 is better than rpy?

Since rpy2 is a redesign of rpy, I suppose that rpy2 is better than rpy in certain aspects. But I don't see where this is described in the document. Could somebody let me know how rpy2 is better than rpy? Thank you! -- Com

Re: [Rpy] na.action?

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote: >>> >>> Ideally I'd like rpy2 to map "arg_name" (in Python code) to either >>> "arg_name" or "arg.name" (when talking to R) as appropriate for >>> the function concerned, but raise an error if both possibilities are >>> defined. That way I co

Re: [Rpy] na.action?

Laurent Gautier wrote: > Peter wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Laurent Gautier >> wrote: >>> Peter wrote: Can you do something like check if example_name is a valid argument for the function at run time, and if not, check example.name instead? Would this impose too high