Re: [Rpy] na.action?

2009-10-01 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Warnes, Gregory R. wrote: > These are the longstanding rpy rules (where 'x' represents any sequence > of valid name character in *python*, including A-Z, a-Z anywhere and 0-9 > anywhere except in the first position): > > python  R               Example > x_x      

Re: [Rpy] na.action?

2009-10-01 Thread Warnes, Gregory R.
Hi All, These are the longstanding rpy rules (where 'x' represents any sequence of valid name character in *python*, including A-Z, a-Z anywhere and 0-9 anywhere except in the first position): python R Example x_x x.x print_default(m) --> print.default(m) x_

Re: [Rpy] na.action?

2009-10-01 Thread Laurent Gautier
Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: >> Nathaniel Smith wrote: >>> IMHO, if you're wondering about the case where *both* are valid, then >>> you've already lost. If you're wondering that, then it means you're >>> trying to handle the case where function