On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:11 PM, laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I have briefly seen that you are doing it at the rpy2.robjects
> level. That's certainly a good way to go when wanting to offer such
> capability.
>
> Regarding SexpVector accepting numpy's one-dimensional arrays, that's
> b
I took the time to do that a little earlier.
There are adaptations to the patch, and the numpy-capabilities are
confined to a module (this way, no conditional import - and you can have
more freedom to modify further your code).
It also made me realize shortcomings in the design of
rpy2.robjects-
Revision: 697
http://rpy.svn.sourceforge.net/rpy/?rev=697&view=rev
Author: lgautier
Date: 2008-11-19 22:12:22 + (Wed, 19 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
---
robjects:
- new module conversion (useful for user-defined additional conversion
function)
- new module numpy2ri (
