Hi,
I'm working on a way to pass per-architecture package counts to
scriptlets [1]. Jeff Johnson suggested creating a new database index
for this purpose [2].
Attached are two patches against Fedora 9's rpm. The first adds a
Namearch index to the RPM database. The second uses Namearch to
impl
Pixel wrote:
> Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'm working on a way to pass per-architecture package counts to
>> scriptlets [1]. Jeff Johnson suggested creating a new database index
>> for this purpose [2].
>>
>> Attached are
Pixel wrote:
Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
In the typical case, rpmtsRun() is already doing 2 iterations on
"Name" doing headerLoad. And there are a few more.
IMO if we look at optimisations, there are many things that should be
done before this. For e
fitzsim left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3667)
> > I did create a minimal standlone library that replicates the issue using
> > GCC, binutils, and the Common Lisp elf system, which I can provide steps
> > for if necessary.
>
> Please do. Without a reproducer it's hard for us to do mu
fitzsim created an issue (rpm-software-management/rpm#3667)
When packaging a proprietary program, I encountered a library file that
contained both `RPATH` and `RUNPATH`.
`check-rpath-worker` reports this as an error as a side effect of not properly
handling the fact that there are two entries.
fitzsim left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3694)
The library being committed is trivial, and it is just the output binary; I was
not intending the generation code's license to apply to it. Just a pointer to
the repository is fine, no need to even mention the license of the generation