[Rpm-maint] [PATCH] rpmdbCountPackagesArch

2008-06-27 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Hi, I'm working on a way to pass per-architecture package counts to scriptlets [1]. Jeff Johnson suggested creating a new database index for this purpose [2]. Attached are two patches against Fedora 9's rpm. The first adds a Namearch index to the RPM database. The second uses Namearch to impl

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] rpmdbCountPackagesArch

2008-06-30 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Pixel wrote: > Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm working on a way to pass per-architecture package counts to >> scriptlets [1]. Jeff Johnson suggested creating a new database index >> for this purpose [2]. >> >> Attached are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] rpmdbCountPackagesArch

2008-07-02 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
Pixel wrote: Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] In the typical case, rpmtsRun() is already doing 2 iterations on "Name" doing headerLoad. And there are a few more. IMO if we look at optimisations, there are many things that should be done before this. For e

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] check-rpaths-worker should handle ELF files that have both RPATH and RUNPATH (Issue #3667)

2025-03-20 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3667) > > I did create a minimal standlone library that replicates the issue using > > GCC, binutils, and the Common Lisp elf system, which I can provide steps > > for if necessary. > > Please do. Without a reproducer it's hard for us to do mu

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] check-rpaths-worker should handle ELF files that have both RPATH and RUNPATH (Issue #3667)

2025-03-18 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim created an issue (rpm-software-management/rpm#3667) When packaging a proprietary program, I encountered a library file that contained both `RPATH` and `RUNPATH`. `check-rpath-worker` reports this as an error as a side effect of not properly handling the fact that there are two entries.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Check RPATH and RUNPATH separately in check-rpaths (PR #3694)

2025-03-28 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3694) The library being committed is trivial, and it is just the output binary; I was not intending the generation code's license to apply to it. Just a pointer to the repository is fine, no need to even mention the license of the generation